Clinical Response and Symptomatic Remission in Children Treated With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 559-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Findling ◽  
Ben Adeyi ◽  
Gary Chen ◽  
Bryan Dirks ◽  
Thomas Babcock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Long Term Study ◽  
Symptomatic Remission

ABSTRACTObjective: To examine clinical response and symptomatic remission in two studies of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Methods: In a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, children 6–12 years of age with ADHD received LDX (30–70 mg/day) or placebo. In an open-label trial, children from previous studies were titrated to optimal dose over 4 weeks and maintained up to 1 year. Primary and secondary efficacy assessments were the ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, respectively. Clinical response was defined as ≥30% reduction in ADHD-RS-IV total score with a CGI-I rating of 1 or 2; symptomatic remission was defined by ADHD-RS-IV total score ≤18.Results: In the 4-week study (N=285), at any postdose assessment, 79.3% achieved response (median 13 days) and 67.1% achieved remission (median 22 days) with LDX versus 29.2% and 23.6% with placebo. In the long-term study (N=251), at any postdose assessment, 96.0% responded and 62.7% maintained response; 88.8% achieved remission and 46.4% maintained remission.Conclusion: Most children treated with LDX achieved clinical response and symptomatic remission at one time point; once achieved, almost half maintained remission.

scholarly journals Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 573-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Weisler ◽  
Joel Young ◽  
Greg Mattingly ◽  
Joseph Gao ◽  
Liza Squires ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder

ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in the treatment of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Methods: Following a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 349 adults with ADHD were enrolled into an open-label, single-arm study for up to 12 months. Treatment was initiated at 30 mg/day and titrated up to 70 mg/day at subsequent visits to achieve optimal effectiveness and tolerability. Safety assessments included adverse events inquiries, vital signs, and electrocardiograms while the primary effectiveness assessment was the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) total score.Results: A total of 191 (54.7%) subjects completed the study. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were upper respiratory tract infection (21.8%), insomnia (19.5%), headache (17.2%), dry mouth (16.6%), decreased appetite (14.3%), and irritability (11.2%). Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. At endpoint, small but statistically significant increases in pulse and blood pressure were noted. Significant improvements in mean ADHD-RS total scores were observed at week 1 and sustained throughout the study (P<.0001 at all postbaseline visits). At endpoint, the mean improvement from baseline ADHD-RS total score was 24.8 (P<.0001).Conclusions: LDX demonstrated a safety profile consistent with long-acting stimulant use and provided continued effectiveness in adults with ADHD for up to 12 months.

scholarly journals Characteristics of ADHD Symptom Response/Remission in a Clinical Trial of Methylphenidate Extended Release

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Weiss ◽  
Ann Childress ◽  
Earl Nordbrock ◽  
Akwete Adjei ◽  
Robert Kupper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Percent Change

Clinical trials in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have typically measured outcome using clinician ratings on the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Remission has been defined as an endpoint score of less than or equal to 18 on the ADHD-RS-IV (or a mean score of 1). Responders have been defined as patients who achieve a CGI-I score of much or very much improved (1 or 2). There is a lack of agreement in the literature on what percent change in symptoms on the ADHD-RS-IV should be used to define improvement or remission. This study uses data from a clinical trial of a methylphenidate extended release (MPH-MLR; Aptensio XR®) phase III clinical trial to attempt to determine the percent change of symptoms that best corresponds with improvement and remission. Symptom remission at endpoint (ADHD-RS-IV total score ≤18) was most closely aligned with a ≥46% reduction in ADHD-RS-IV total score. Clinical improvement was most closely aligned with a ≥40% reduction in ADHD-RS-IV total score. The three different measures of outcome were strongly aligned during double blind and open label treatment, and were independent of subtype status. Our data suggest that at least 40% improvement in symptoms is needed to achieve a robust response at endpoint.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in School-Aged Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 614-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Findling ◽  
Ann C. Childress ◽  
Suma Krishnan ◽  
James J. McGough
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Clinical Global Impression ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Clinical Global Impression Improvement

ABSTRACTIntroduction:Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a prodrug stimulant, is indicated for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children 6–12 years of age and in adults. In shortterm studies, once-daily LDX provided efficacy throughout the day. This study presented here was conducted to assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of LDX in 6- to 12-year-olds with ADHD.Methods:This open-label, multicenter, singlearm study enrolled children with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-Text Revision criteria for ADHD. Following 1-week screening and washout periods, subjects were titrated to LDX 30, 50, or 70 mg/day over 4 weeks and placed on maintenance treatment for 11 months. The ADHD Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale measured effectiveness.Results:Of 272 subjects receiving LDX, 147 completed the study. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and occurred during the first 4 weeks. There were no clinically meaningful changes in blood pressure or electrocardiographic parameters. From baseline to endpoint, mean ADHD Rating Scale scores improved by 27.2 points (P<.0001). Improvements occurred during each of the first 4 weeks, and were maintained throughout. Based on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale scores, >80% of subjects at endpoint and >95% of completers at 12 months were rated “improved.”Conclusion:Long-term 30, 50, and 70 mg/day LDX was generally well tolerated and effective in children with ADHD.

Vortioxetine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Biederman ◽  
Annika Lindsten ◽  
Lasse B Sluth ◽  
Maria Louise Petersen ◽  
Anders Ettrup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Adult Adhd ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Functioning ◽  
Concept Study ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder

Background: Stimulants remain the mainstay of treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but are often associated with insufficient response or poor tolerability, leading to many patients not wishing to be treated with controlled substances. Aims: This randomized, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study (NCT02327013) evaluated the efficacy of a multimodal antidepressant, vortioxetine, in the treatment of ADHD, using a two-stage sequential parallel comparison design. Methods: Patients aged 18–55 years with a diagnosis of ADHD (DSM-5) and a total score ⩾24 on the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) were randomized in study stage I with a 1:1:3 ratio to six weeks of treatment with vortioxetine 10 or 20 mg/day, or placebo ( n = 227). In study stage II, placebo non-responders (AISRS total score reduction <30% from stage I baseline) were re-randomized with a 1:1:1 ratio to six weeks of vortioxetine 10 or 20 mg/day, or placebo ( n = 59). Results: Across the two study stages combined, ADHD symptoms improved by approximately eight AISRS points in all treatment groups, showing no difference from placebo for either dose of vortioxetine, the study thus failing to meet its primary endpoint. However, both doses of vortioxetine separated from placebo in improving overall patient functioning, as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale. Conclusion: Studies are warranted to further investigate this suggested benefit of a multimodal antidepressant for patient functioning in ADHD while addressing issues of non-adherence and placebo response. The study confirmed vortioxetine 10 mg and 20 mg as generally well-tolerated.

Atomoxetine versus Methylphenidate in Paediatric Outpatients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufeng Wang ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
Yasong Du ◽  
Dong H. Song ◽  
Yee-Jin Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Adhd Symptoms ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
End Point ◽  
Blind Comparison

Objective: To (i) test whether atomoxetine is non-inferior to methylphenidate in treating symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in paediatric patients; and (ii) determine the tolerability of the two drugs. Method: This double-blind study was conducted in 6- to 16-year-old outpatients with ADHD (DSM-IV) in China, Korea and Mexico (January–October 2004). Patients were randomly assigned to once-daily atomoxetine (0.8–1.8 mg kg−1 day−1; n = 164) or twice-daily methylphenidate (0.2–0.6 mg kg−1 day−1; n = 166) for ∼8 weeks. Primary efficacy assessment was the comparison of response rates (≥40% reduction from baseline to end point in total score) on the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and -Scored. Tolerability measures included, but were not limited to, the assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and weight. Results: Atomoxetine was non-inferior to methylphenidate in improving ADHD symptoms based on response rates (atomoxetine, 77.4%; methylphenidate, 81.5%; one-sided 95% lower confidence limit = −11.7%, p = 0.404). Treatment-emergent adverse effects experienced significantly more frequently in the atomoxetine group, compared with the methylphenidate group, included anorexia (37.2% vs. 25.3%; p = 0.024), nausea (20.1% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.014), somnolence (26.2% vs. 3.6%; p <0.001), dizziness (15.2% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.024) and vomiting (11.6% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.007), most of which were of mild or moderate severity. Atomoxetine-treated patients experienced a small but significantly greater mean weight loss from baseline to end point than methylphenidate-treated patients (−1.2 kg vs. −0.4 kg; p <0.001). Conclusions: This study suggests that atomoxetine is non-inferior to methylphenidate in the improvement of ADHD symptoms in paediatric outpatients. Although both of the drugs were well tolerated, atomoxetine was associated with a higher incidence of TEAEs than methylphenidate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document