A Review of the Statutory Valuation of Long-Term Insurance Business in the United Kingdom

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 803-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.W. Wright ◽  
S.J. Burgess ◽  
R.G. Chadburn ◽  
A.J.M. Chamberlain ◽  
R. Frankland ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThis paper considers the approaches currently used by life offices for statutory valuations, and proposes a number of changes to current practice. It builds on the earlier work of Philip Scott's Working Party and a working party which reported on all aspects of unitised with-profits business to the 1996 CILA conference.Recommendations are made for each of the major categories of long-term business, in particular for the introduction of a bonus reserve standard for accumulating with-profits business, whilst retaining the net premium standard for conventional with-profits business. It is proposed that the current net premium approach for non-profit business should be replaced by a gross premium method. The paper also develops a greater codification of the calculation of non-unit reserves on linked business.Considerable emphasis is placed on the requirement for statutory reserves to have regard to PRE. It is assumed throughout that the E.C. Third Life Directive remains in its current form.A number of examples are provided which illustrate the proposed method for accumulating with-profits business. Appendices to the paper include a draft of suggested consequential changes to the Insurance Companies Regulations 1994, and a revised supporting version of the whole of GN8.

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1029-1058
Author(s):  
P.W. Wright ◽  
S.J. Burgess ◽  
R.G. Chadburn ◽  
A.J.M. Chamberlain ◽  
R. Frankland ◽  
...  

The text of this paper, together with the abstract of the discussion held by the Faculty of Actuaries on 16 March 1998, are printed in British Actuarial Journal, 4, IV, 803-864


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Booth

ABSTRACTFrom 1870, in the United Kingdom, a generally liberal legal framework for life insurance existed which commanded wide support, particularly from the actuarial profession. Despite its apparent liberalism, however, it is likely that the regulatory framework impeded market entry, particularly of mutual companies. The liberal framework broke down in a number of incremental steps from 1946. This paper traces the development of U.K. life assurance regulation for 101 years from the mid-Victorian period, analyses contemporary reflections on the legal framework within the actuarial profession, and examines the appropriateness of the legal framework for achieving specific economic objectives for long-term insurance regulation.


1975 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Bews ◽  
P. A. C. Seymour ◽  
A. N. D. Shaw ◽  
F. R. Wales

1.1. Section 78 of the Insurance Companies Act 1974 makes provision for Regulations to be made for the valuation of assets and liabilities. Regulations relating to the valuation of assets, although not published at the time of writing, are expected to be laid before Parliament in the near future.It is expected that the corresponding Regulations for the valuation of liabilities will be issued later in 1975.1.2. The Department of Trade has consulted interested bodies, including the Faculty and the Institute, with regard to proposals for the content of the Valuation of Liabilities Regulations and with its permission part of the relevant Consultative Note is reproduced in Appendix I.


1988 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. M. Fine ◽  
C. P. Headdon ◽  
T. W. Hewitson ◽  
C. M. Johnson ◽  
I. C. Lumsden ◽  
...  

1.1 The background to the production of this paper is somewhat involved, but is necessary for an understanding of why it contains what it does. Readers who are familiar with recent developments in the valuation field may proceed straight to Section 2.1.2 Statutory valuations of long-term insurance business under the Insurance Companies Act 1982 (‘the Act’, which superseded the 1974 and 1981 Acts) and the Insurance Companies Regulations 1981 (‘the current Regulations’) have now been prepared by actuaries for some years. Similarly the guidance issued by the profession to Appointed Actuaries, specifically GN1 and GN8, has also remained substantially unchanged over that period. The time was opportune for valuation practice to be reviewed in the light of recent experience.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 851-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J. Nowell ◽  
J.R. Crispin ◽  
M. Iqbal ◽  
S.F. Margutti ◽  
A. Muldoon

ABSTRACTA working party was set up in February 1999 by the Research Committee of the Life Board to consider the impact of a low inflationary environment on the financial services and investment markets with particular emphasis on companies conducting long-term insurance business.The working party has produced an interim report which reviews the causes of the present expectation of low inflation and discusses evidence from the past and the role of demographics. It considers issues surrounding the composition of the retail price index, appropriate economic assumptions and the impact on investment markets, including the effect of charges on net returns to savers. The position of long-term insurance business is then considered in more detail, looking at HM Treasury return consequences as well as disclosure and product design features. Finally, there are two investigations, the first looking at the effect of low inflation on the achieved profits derived from different product designs, and the second looking at the changes in ruin probability for a with-profits office associated with declining inflation.


1971 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 20-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. M. Oppé

SynopsisThe European Economic Community (Common Market) was established by the Treaty of Rome signed by six countries, namely, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, in 1957.Many of the eleven basic aims of the Treaty have some bearing on insurance business. The free movement of persons, services and capital is of the greatest technical interest to insurers but the measures designed to promote the economic growth of the Community which will include the expansion and improvement of capital markets could be of even greater interest—particularly to life assurers. Another aim of the Treaty, viz. to ensure fair competition within the Community, could act as a constraint on the introduction of liberalizing measures.The general programme for the progressive establishment of the Common Market over a transitional period of 12 years (extended if necessary) included a specific timetable for the introduction of freedom of establishment and freedom of services in respect of insurance transactions. The implementation of this programme as it concerns insurance has fallen into arrears and only one of the five directives which were scheduled has so far been promulgated. Nevertheless, the achievement of the aims of the Treaty of Rome must eventually result in the gradual harmonization of legislation affecting insurance business within the member states. Chiefly because of the need to avoid any distortion of competition, the measures introduced are likely to apply to all insurers within the E.E.C. irrespective of whether they transact business in one or more member states.It is premature to consider in detail the likely terms and conditions of the E.E.C. legislation as this is still a long way off. Insofar as the present pattern of insurance control legislation of most E.E.C. countries is more restrictive—particularly for long-term business—than in the United Kingdom, any short-term solution for harmonizing legislation would seem likely to involve British companies in more stringent rules. It is hoped that the E.E.C. will take into account the outcome of the discussions on similar issues which have taken place over the last decade within international organizations such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Comité Européen des Assurances on which the United Kingdom is represented. E.E.C. thinking may also be influenced in the direction of the progressive liberalization of insurance control legislation by the record of life assurance business in the United Kingdom and by the need to encourage the development of capital markets to which life assurance is an important contributor as a source of long-term and regular savings. Thus the ultimate pattern of E.E.C. legislation may well reflect the British system of freedom, provided such a system is well presented within the E.E.C. negotiations. Generally, problems for the British actuary will arise from the imposition of new rules within the E.E.C. not only for insurance transactions but for the many other commercial transactions with which the actuary is professionally interested as advisor or participant.Special areas of long-term business such as pension schemes; life reassurance; equity-linked contracts and private sickness insurance are described. Last but not least, in connexion with the introduction of freedom of mobility of labour, it may be necessary to consider to what extent actuarial qualifications earned in another member country can be recognized as enabling an actuary to practise in the United Kingdom.


1988 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 1-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Sanders ◽  
N. F. Silby

Schedule 1 of the Insurance Companies Act 1982 defines Permanent Health Insurance (PHI) as a class of Long Term insurance business being “… contracts of insurance providing specified benefits against risks of persons becoming incapacitated in consequence of sustaining injury as a result of an accident or of an accident of a specified class or of sickness or infirmity being contracts that:(a) are expressed to be in effect for a period of not less than five years, or until the normal retirement age for the persons concerned or without limit of time, and(b) either are not expressed to be terminable by the insurer, or are expressed be so terminable only in special circumstances mentioned in the contract.”The fundamental features of PHI as developed in the U.K. are therefore:(a) It provides specified benefits in the event of ill health.(b) Cover may not be cancelled by the insurer (except under special circumstances described in the policy document) and hence the insurance is ‘permanent’.


1987 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 369-443
Author(s):  
A. E. M. Fine ◽  
C. P. Headdon ◽  
T. W. Hewitson ◽  
C. M. Johnson ◽  
I. C. Lumsden ◽  
...  

1.1 The background to the production of this paper is somewhat involved, but is necessary for an understanding of why it contains what it does. Readers who are familiar with recent developments in the valuation field may proceed straight to Section 2.1.2 Statutory valuations of long-term insurance business under the Insurance Companies Act 1982 (“the Act”, which superseded the 1974 and 1981 Acts) and the Insurance Companies Regulations 1981 (“the current Regulations”) have now been prepared by actuaries for some years. Similarly the guidance issued by the profession to Appointed Actuaries, specifically GN1 and GN8, has also remained substantially unchanged over that period. The time was opportune for valuation practice to be reviewed in the light of recent experience.


2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 485-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.D. Wazait ◽  
S.Z. Al-Bhueissi ◽  
H.R.H. Patel ◽  
M.S. Nathan ◽  
R.A. Miller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document