Bridging the research–practice gap: Developing a measurement framework for work–life initiatives

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-258
Author(s):  
E Anne Bardoel ◽  
Helen De Cieri ◽  
Susan Mayson

AbstractResearch in human resource management has advocated the development of a systematic process of measurement that enables managers to obtain and evaluate evidence about the performance of work–life initiatives, in both financial and non-financial terms. We apply the resource-based view of the firm, within the context of strategic human resource management literature, and conduct qualitative research in focus groups with human resource professionals and managers from 27 medium to large organisations operating in Australia. Our research explores what organisations are currently measuring with regard to work–life outcomes, how they are measuring it, and what they would like to measure. Integrating the practitioners' perspective with academic literature, we develop a framework of measurement for work–life initiatives.

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Anne Bardoel ◽  
Helen De Cieri ◽  
Susan Mayson

AbstractResearch in human resource management has advocated the development of a systematic process of measurement that enables managers to obtain and evaluate evidence about the performance of work–life initiatives, in both financial and non-financial terms. We apply the resource-based view of the firm, within the context of strategic human resource management literature, and conduct qualitative research in focus groups with human resource professionals and managers from 27 medium to large organisations operating in Australia. Our research explores what organisations are currently measuring with regard to work–life outcomes, how they are measuring it, and what they would like to measure. Integrating the practitioners' perspective with academic literature, we develop a framework of measurement for work–life initiatives.


2021 ◽  
pp. 014920632199354
Author(s):  
Jason D. Shaw

Barney’s elaboration on the resource-based view had a major impact on research in strategic human resource management (SHRM) and beyond. In this article, I reflect on its influence and use in SHRM research and analyze the strengths and limitations of the original work. I also review various spinoffs and expansions of the original work as well as trends in empirical SHRM research.


1992 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Wright ◽  
Gary C. McMahan

Critics have argued that the field of human resource management (HRM) lacks a coherent theoreticalframework. This article attempts to further the theoretical development of SHRM through discussing six theoretical models (behavioral perspective, cybernetic models, agencyltransaction cost theory, resource-based view of the firm, power/resource dependence models, and institutional theory) that are usefulfor understanding both strategic and non-strategic determinants of HR practices. Finally, the implications of a stronger theoretical approach to SHRM research and practice are discussed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Wright ◽  
Benjamin B. Dunford ◽  
Scott A. Snell

The resource-based view (RBV) of the firm has influenced the field of strategic human resource management (SHRM) in a number of ways. This paper explores the impact of the RBV on the theoretical and empirical development of SHRM. It explores how the fields of strategy and SHRM are beginning to converge around a number of issues, and proposes a number of implications of this convergence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document