Nick Martin and the ‘Boulder Workshops’

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-81
Author(s):  
John K. Hewitt

AbstractThe author provides a personal perspective on Nick Martin’s contributions to behavioral genetics and his role in the workshops on statistical genetics held annually in Boulder. Highlighted are Prof. Martin’s seminal work on multivariate behavioral genetics, his career-long commitment to the value of the study of twins, and his enthusiastic support of the didactic mission of the ‘Boulder workshops’. These contributions and activities continue unabated as we celebrate Prof. Martin’s 70th birthday.

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-113
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Keller

AbstractNick Martin has had an outsized influence on the field of behavioral genetics. Much of this influence stems from his mentorship of young scientists. I describe Nick’s mentorship, and what makes it special, from a personal perspective.


1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1126-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Gilger

This paper is an introduction to behavioral genetics for researchers and practioners in language development and disorders. The specific aims are to illustrate some essential concepts and to show how behavioral genetic research can be applied to the language sciences. Past genetic research on language-related traits has tended to focus on simple etiology (i.e., the heritability or familiality of language skills). The current state of the art, however, suggests that great promise lies in addressing more complex questions through behavioral genetic paradigms. In terms of future goals it is suggested that: (a) more behavioral genetic work of all types should be done—including replications and expansions of preliminary studies already in print; (b) work should focus on fine-grained, theory-based phenotypes with research designs that can address complex questions in language development; and (c) work in this area should utilize a variety of samples and methods (e.g., twin and family samples, heritability and segregation analyses, linkage and association tests, etc.).


1980 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Harold A. Scheraga
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Melanie K. T. Takarangi ◽  
Deryn Strange

When people are told that their negative memories are worse than other people’s, do they later remember those events differently? We asked participants to recall a recent negative memory then, 24 h later, we gave some participants feedback about the emotional impact of their event – stating it was more or less negative compared to other people’s experiences. One week later, participants recalled the event again. We predicted that if feedback affected how participants remembered their negative experiences, their ratings of the memory’s characteristics should change over time. That is, when participants are told that their negative event is extremely negative, their memories should be more vivid, recollected strongly, and remembered from a personal perspective, compared to participants in the other conditions. Our results provide support for this hypothesis. We suggest that external feedback might be a potential mechanism in the relationship between negative memories and psychological well-being.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 886-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. McArdle
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document