Deep Eutectic Solvents as Azeotrope Breakers: Liquid–Liquid Extraction and COSMO-RS Prediction

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 5640-5650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreia S. L. Gouveia ◽  
Filipe S. Oliveira ◽  
Kiki A. Kurnia ◽  
Isabel M. Marrucho
Keyword(s):  
Deep Eutectic Solvents ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction

scholarly journals Recovery of lignin from deep eutectic solvents by liquid-liquid extraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 116127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dion Smink ◽  
Sascha R.A. Kersten ◽  
Boelo Schuur
Keyword(s):  
Deep Eutectic Solvents ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction

Separation of phenol and pyridine from coal tar via liquid–liquid extraction using deep eutectic solvents

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 112-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiantian Jiao ◽  
Xizhuang Qin ◽  
Huawei Zhang ◽  
Wenrui Zhang ◽  
Yaqing Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Tar ◽  
Deep Eutectic Solvents ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction

Oil desulfurization using deep eutectic solvents as sustainable and economical extractants via liquid-liquid extraction: Experimental and PC-SAFT predictions

2018 ◽  
Vol 467 ◽  
pp. 33-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samah E.E. Warrag ◽  
Clarissa Pototzki ◽  
Nerea R. Rodriguez ◽  
Martin van Sint Annaland ◽  
Maaike C. Kroon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Eutectic Solvents ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction

Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Recovery of Bio-Based Chemicals: Solid–Liquid Equilibria and Liquid–Liquid Extraction

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 796
Author(s):  
Thomas Brouwer ◽  
Bas C. Dielis ◽  
Jorrit M. Bock ◽  
Boelo Schuur
Keyword(s):  
Lactic Acid ◽  
Formic Acid ◽  
Levulinic Acid ◽  
Deep Eutectic Solvents ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Lewis Base ◽  
Trioctylphosphine Oxide ◽  
Base Interaction ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction ◽  
Solid Liquid

The solid–liquid equilibrium (SLE) behavior and liquid–liquid extraction (LLX) abilities of deep eutectic solvents (DESs) containing (a) thymol and L-menthol, and (b) trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) and L-menthol were evaluated. The distribution coefficients (KD) were determined for the solutes relevant for two biorefinery cases, including formic acid, levulinic acid, furfural, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and L-lactic acid. Overall, for both cases, an increasing KD was observed for both DESs for acids increasing in size and thus hydrophobicity. Furfural, being the most hydrophobic, was seen to extract the highest KD (for DES (a) 14.2 ± 2.2 and (b) 4.1 ± 0.3), and the KD of lactic acid was small, independent of the DESs (DES (a) 0.5 ± 0.07 and DES (b) 0.4 ± 0.05). The KD of the acids for the TOPO and L-menthol DES were in similar ranges as for traditional TOPO-containing composite solvents, while for the thymol/L-menthol DES, in the absence of the Lewis base functionality, a smaller KD was observed. The selectivity of formic acid and levulinic acid separation was different for the two DESs investigated because of the acid–base interaction of the phosphine group. The thymol and L-menthol DES was selective towards levulinic acid (Sij = 9.3 +/− 0.10, and the TOPO and L-menthol DES was selective towards FA (Sij = 2.1 +/− 0.28).

Separation of ethylbenzene and n-octane using deep eutectic solvents

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed K. Hadj-Kali
Keyword(s):  
Ionic Liquid ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Deep Eutectic Solvents ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction

AbstractIn this work, we have investigated the possibility of using low cost ionic liquid analogues, namely deep eutectic solvents (DESs), for the liquid-liquid extraction of ethylbenzene from

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document