Alternative Energy Systems: Nuclear Energy Introduction to the Special Section on Nuclear Energy in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 605-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina M. Nenoff
Author(s):  
Robin J. McDaniel

Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technologies have been recently deemed by the DOE as clean energy, a low carbon-dioxide emitting “alternative energy” source. Recent UN Sustainability Goals and Global Climate Talks to reduce the anthropomorphic Carbon-Dioxide atmospheric concentrations signal a renewed interest and need for nuclear power. The objective of this paper is to present an improved approach to the evaluation of “Hybrid Nuclear Energy Systems”. A hybrid energy system is defined as an energy system that utilizes two or more sources of energy to be used in single or multiple applications. Traditional single sourced energy or power systems require the amount of energy creation and the production of usable power to be carefully balanced. With the introduction of multiple energy sources, loads, and energy capacitors, the design, simulation, and operation of such hybrid systems requires a new approach to analysis and control. This paper introduces three examples of “Hybrid Nuclear Energy Systems”, for large scale power, industrial heat, and electricity generation. The system component independence, reliability, availability, and dynamic control aspects, coupled with component operational decisions presents a new way to optimize energy production and availability. Additional novel hybrid hydro-nuclear systems, concentrated solar-nuclear power desalination systems, and nuclear-insitu petroleum extraction systems are compared. The design aspects of such hybrid systems suitable for process heat, electricity generation, and/or desalination applications are discussed. After a multiple-year research study of past hybrid reactor designs and recent system proposals, the following design evaluation approach is the result of analysis of the best concepts discovered. This review of existing literature has summerized that postulated benefits of Hybrid Nuclear Sytems are; reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased energy conversion efficiency, high reliability of electricity supply and consistent power quality, reduced fossil fuel dependence, less fresh water consumption, conversion of local coal or shale into higher value fuels, while lowering the risks and costs. As these proposed hybrid systems are interdisciplinary in nature, they will require a new multidisciplinary approach to systems evaluation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (37) ◽  
pp. 11819-11820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina M. Nenoff ◽  
Michael R. Berman ◽  
Katherine C. Glasgow ◽  
Mark C. Cesa ◽  
Hessy Taft

2019 ◽  
Vol 527 ◽  
pp. 151837 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.S. Was ◽  
D. Petti ◽  
S. Ukai ◽  
S. Zinkle

Author(s):  
Yong-Hoon Shin ◽  
Il Soon Hwang ◽  
Massimiliano Polidori ◽  
Paride Meloni ◽  
Vincenzo Casamassima ◽  
...  

As one of the Generation-IV reactor concepts, lead-alloy-cooled advanced nuclear energy systems (LACANES) have been studied worldwide in order to utilize the advantages of good heat transfer properties, neutron transparency and chemical inertness with air and water. Since the Fukushima accident, the passive safety aspect of the LACANES is increasingly emphasized due to outstanding natural circulation capability. To investigate the thermal-hydraulic capability of LBE, an international cooperation has been performed under OECD/NEA program, under the guidance of the Nuclear Science Committee by a task force named as Lead Alloy Cooled Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems (LACANES) since 2007. This international collaboration had dealt with computational benchmarking of isothermal LBE forced convection tests in the phase I, and the working group published a guideline for using one-dimensional system codes to simulate LBE forced circulation test results from HELIOS loop. The phase II was started after that, to give an additional guideline in the case of natural circulation. NACIE, one of benchmarking targets for the phase II which is a rectangular-shape loop located at ENEA-Brasimone Research Centre, Italy. NACIE test results were benchmarked by each participant using their one-dimensional thermal-hydraulic codes, and they are to follow the guideline from the LACANES phase I for regions where hydraulic loss occurs. Due to the selection of hydraulic loss coefficient relations by users, the cross-comparison results of international participants showed some discrepancies and the estimated mass flow rates had 13% of maximum error. Also, the future R&D areas are identified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document