Perchloric acid-catalyzed acetic anhydride enol acetylation of steroidal .DELTA.-3-ketones

1968 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 3109-3113 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Liston ◽  
P. Toft

1966 ◽  
Vol 44 (15) ◽  
pp. 1773-1782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman H. Kurihara ◽  
Edgar Page Painter

The rate constants for the perchloric acid catalyzed substitution of one ethylthio group of 2,3,4,5,6-penta-O-acetyl-D-glucose diethyl dithioacetal (Va) and the acetoxy group bonded to C1 of 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexa-O-acetyl-D-glucose S-ethyl monothioacetal (VIa) have been measured when the substrates were dissolved in solutions of acetic acid and acetic anhydride. The rate-determining step is interpreted to be the dissociation of the substrate conjugate acid to give a carbonium–sulfonium cation. The rate constants indicate that acyclic sugar derivatives are substituted faster than cyclic (pyranose) derivatives, and that an acetoxy group is substituted faster than an ethylthio group.



1976 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-364
Author(s):  
B. M. Savin ◽  
S. A. Kesler


1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1366-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Egle ◽  
V. Gabelica ◽  
A.J. Kresge ◽  
T.T. Tidwell

Rates of conversion of 1-(tri-n-butylstannyl)-2-phenylethyne to phenylethyne in H2O and D2O solutions of perchloric acid were found to be proportional to acid concentration, giving the hydronium ion rate constant [Formula: see text] and the isotope effect [Formula: see text]. The magnitude of this isotope effect suggests that the reaction occurs by rate-determining hydron transfer to the substrate, producing a vinyl carbocation; this carbocation then loses its tributylstannyl group, giving phenylacetylene as the only detectable aromatic product. The hydronium ion rate constant, when compared to the rates of protonation of phenylethyne and 1-(trimethylsilyl)-2-phenylethyne, gives a β-stannyl stabilizing effect of δΔG≠ = 6.6 kcal mol−1 and a differential β-stannyl/β-silyl effect of δΔG≠ = 3.2 kcal mol−1. These stabilizations are very much smaller than previously reported β-stannyl effects. Possible reasons for the difference are suggested. Key words: β-stannyl effect, β-silyl effect, carbocation stabilization, protodemetalation.



ChemInform ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (32) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
Mohd. Imran Ansari ◽  
Mohd. Kamil Hussain ◽  
Nisha Yadav ◽  
Puneet K. Gupta ◽  
K. Hajela


1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Kulikova ◽  
M. M. Levitsky ◽  
A. F. Shestakov ◽  
A. E. Shilov


ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (48) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
T.-S. JIN ◽  
Y.-R. MA ◽  
Z.-H. ZHANG ◽  
T.-S. LI


1964 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1156-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abe. Berger ◽  
J. A. Magnuson


2006 ◽  
Vol 253 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid M. Heravi ◽  
Farahnaz K. Behbahani ◽  
Fatemeh F. Bamoharram


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document