scholarly journals Extended Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) therapy for relapsed or refractory low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.D. Piro ◽  
C.A. White ◽  
A.J. Grillo-López ◽  
N. Janakiraman ◽  
A. Saven ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 3135-3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Davis ◽  
Antonio J. Grillo-López ◽  
Christine A. White ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Myron S. Czuczman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of re-treatment with rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who relapsed after a response to rituximab therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled onto this study, and two were re-treated within the study. Patients received an intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m2 of rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. All patients had at least two prior therapies and had received at least one prior course of rituximab, with a median interval of 14.5 months between rituximab courses. RESULTS: Most adverse experiences (AEs) were transient grade 1 or 2 events occurring during the treatment period. Clinically significant myelosuppression was not observed; hematologic toxicity was generally mild and reversible. No patient developed human antichimeric antibodies after treatment. The type, frequency, and severity of AEs in this study were not apparently different from those reported in the phase III trial of rituximab. The overall response rate in 57 assessable patients was 40% (11% complete response and 30% partial responses). Median time to progression (TTP) in responders and median duration of response (DR) have not been reached, but Kaplan-Meier estimated medians are 17.8 months (range, 5.4+ to 26.6 months) and 16.3 months (range, 3.7+ to 25.1 months), respectively. These estimated medians are longer than the medians achieved in the patients’ prior course of rituximab (TTP and DR of 12.4 and 9.8 months, respectively, P > .1) and in a previously reported phase III trial (TTP in responders and DR of 13.2 and 11.6 months, respectively). Responses are ongoing in seven of 23 responders. CONCLUSION: In this re-treatment population, safety and efficacy were not apparently different from those after initial rituximab exposure.


1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Gasparini ◽  
Emilio Bombardieri ◽  
Carlo Tondini ◽  
Lorenzo Mattioli ◽  
Lynne Hughes ◽  
...  

Aims and Background Adequate clinical staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients is essential because only localized disease can be treated satisfactorily. Many imaging procedures are necessary to stage the disease accurately. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an anti-lymphoma antibody in the Fab’ fragment form, labelled with 99mTc, to detect malignant lesions. Methods Radioimmunodetection (RAID) with 99mTc-labelled B-cell lymphoma monoclonal antibody IMMU-LL2-Fab’ (LymphoSCAN™; Immunomedics, Morris Plain, NJ, USA) was investigated in 10 patients (5 females and 5 males; age range, 20-72 years) with histologically proved non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Of the 10 lymphomas, 7 were intermediate grade and 3 were low grade. Whole body images with multiple planar views were obtained at 30 min, 4-6 and 24 h after i.v. injection of 1 mg LL2-Fab’ labelled with 740-925 MBq of 99mTc. SPET of the chest or abdomen was performed in all patients 5-8 h after the immunoreagent injection. Results No adverse reactions were observed in any patient after Mab infusion, and no appreciable changes were seen in the blood counts, renal or liver function tests. A total of 18 of 21 (85.7%) lymphoma lesions were detected by RAID. All the tumor localizations were confirmed by clinical examination and with other imaging techniques, such as CT scan, MRI or gallium scan. In this series of patients no false-positive results were noted. As regards the biodistribution of the immunoreagent, no appreciable bone marrow activity was seen; splenic targeting was demonstrated in all patients; the tumor-to-non-tumor ratios ranged from 1.2 to 2.8 ad measured by the ROI technique; no difference in uptake was noted for different tumor grades. The images obtained 24 h after injection did not reveal new lesions, but areas of doubtful uptake were seen as positive focal areas in the delayed scan. Conclusions LymphoSCAN™ seems to be useful for detection, staging and follow-up of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document