Effect of Surface Roughness, Type and Size of Model Aggregates on the Bond Strength of Aggregate/Mortar Interface

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinan Caliskan ◽  
Bhushan L. Karihaloo
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo ◽  
Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Diamond Bur ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of three surface treatments and two adhesive systems on the shear bond strength of old and freshly placed amalgam. The results suggested that the intact amalgam showed a significantly higher strength than repaired groups and the strongest repaired specimens were made when the amalgam surfaces were roughened with a diamond bur or microetcher. The adhesive systems showed no significant differences on bond strength with the same superficial texture.

Experimental investigation of the effect of surface roughness on bone-cement-implant shear bond strength

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 254-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Franciscus van Tol ◽  
John E. Tibballs ◽  
Nils Roar Gjerdet ◽  
Peter Ellison
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Experimental Investigation ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Bone Cement ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The effect of surface roughness on AES depth profile.

Shinku ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 793-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao HIRASAKA ◽  
Masao HASHIBA ◽  
Toshiroh YAMASHINA
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Depth Profile ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Effect of surface treatments on push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to fiber posts

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr M. Elnaghy ◽  
Ayman Mandorah ◽  
Ali H. Hassan ◽  
Alaa Elshazli ◽  
Shaymaa Elsaka
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
The Other ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Abstract Background To evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine (BD) and white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) to fiber posts. Methods Two brands of fiber posts were used: Reblida post; RP and RelyX post; RX. Each type of post (n = 80/group) was divided into four groups (n = 20/group) and exposed to surface treatment as follows: Control (no treatment), sandblasting (SB), hydrofluoric acid (HF), and TiF4 4 wt/v%. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups (n = 10/subgroup) based on the type of CSCs used as follows: Subgroup A: BD and Subgroup B: WMTA. Push-out bond strength of BD and WMTA to glass fiber posts was assessed. Data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. A Weibull analysis was performed on the push-out bond strength data. Results BD showed higher bond strength than WMTA (P < 0.001). The push-out bond strength for posts treated with TiF4 4 wt/v% showed greater bond strength than the other surface treatments (P < 0.05). The BD/RP-TiF4 4 wt/v% showed the greater characteristic bond strength (σ0) (15.93) compared with the other groups. Surface treatments modified the surface topography of glass fiber posts. Conclusions The BD/RP-TiF4 4 wt/v% showed greater bond strength compared with the other groups. The TiF4 4 wt/v% surface treatment enhanced the bond strength of BD and WMTA to glass fiber posts than the other treatments. Surface treatment of fiber post with TiF4 4 wt/v% could be used to improve the bond strength with calcium silicate-based cements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document