Forest Ecosystem Responses to Atmospheric Pollution: Linking Comparative With Experimental Studies

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 207-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Dise ◽  
P. Gundersen
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Hofhansl ◽  
Werner Huber ◽  
Anton Weissenhofer ◽  
Wolfgang Wanek ◽  
Oskar Franklin

<p>Currently applied dynamic vegetation models do not realistically represent forest ecosystem processes and thus are not able to reproduce in-situ observations of forest ecosystem responses to drought. This is due to the fact that models typically rely on plant functional types to forecast the functional response of vegetation to climate change and to anthropogenic disturbance. However, recent observations of divergent ecosystem responses between topographic forest sites, differing in the availability of water and nutrients, indicate that we should no longer rely on this outdated concept but rather should explore new avenues of representing vegetation dynamics and associated climate change response in next-generation approaches.</p><p>Global climate change scenarios forecast increasing severity of climate extremes in association with El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Such climate anomalies have been shown to affect forest ecosystem processes such as net primary productivity, which is determined by climate (precipitation, temperature, and light) and soil fertility (geology and topography). However, more recently it has been suggested that the impact of such climate fluctuations on forest productivity was strongly related to local site characteristics, which determined the sensitivity of forest ecosystem processes to climate anomalies.</p><p>We propose a novel approach integrating in-situ observations with remotely sensed estimates of forest aboveground productivity for parameterization of next-generation vegetation models capable of forecasting realistic forest ecosystem responses under future scenarios. Our approach considers local site characteristics associated with topography and disturbance history, both of which determine the sensitivity of forest aboveground productivity to projected climate anomalies. Our results therefore should have crucial implications for management and restoration of forest ecosystems and could be used to refine estimates of forest C sink-strength under future scenarios.</p>


BioScience ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 395 ◽  
Author(s):  
GARY M. LOVETT ◽  
CHARLES D. CANHAM ◽  
MARY A. ARTHUR ◽  
KATHLEEN C. WEATHERS ◽  
ROSS D. FITZHUGH

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Holm ◽  
David M. Medvigy ◽  
Benjamin Smith ◽  
Jeffrey S. Dukes ◽  
Claus Beier ◽  
...  

<p>Climatic extreme events are expected to occur more frequently and potentially be stronger in the future, increasing the likelihood of unprecedented climate extremes (UCEs), or record-breaking events such as prolonged droughts, to occur. To prepare for UCEs and their impacts, we need to develop a better understanding of terrestrial ecosystem responses to events such as extreme drought. We know that intense, extreme droughts can substantially affect ecosystem stability and carbon cycling through increased plant mortality and delaying ecosystem recovery. Our ability to predict such effects is limited due to the lack of experiments focusing on climatic excursions beyond the range of historical experience.</p><p>We explore the response of forest ecosystems to UCEs using two dynamic vegetation demographic models (VDMs), ED2 and LPJ-GUESS, in which the abundances of different plant functional types, as well as tree size- and age-class structure, are emergent properties of resource competition. We investigate the hypothesis that ecosystem responses to UCEs (e.g., unprecedented droughts) cannot be extrapolated from ecosystem responses to milder extremes, as a result of non-linear ecosystem responses (e.g. due to plant plasticity, functional diversity, and trait combinations). We evaluate each model’s mechanisms and state variables prior, during, and after a continuum of drought intensities ultimately reaching very extreme drought scenarios (i.e., 0% to 100% reduction in precipitation for drought durations of 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year scenarios) at two dry forested sites: Palo Verde, Costa Rica (i.e. tropical) and EucFACE, Australia (i.e. temperate). Both models produce nonlinear responses to these UCEs. Due to differences in model structure and process representation, the model’s sensitivity of biomass loss diverged based on either duration or intensity of droughts, as well as different model responses at each site. Biomass losses in ED2 are sensitive to drought duration, while in LPJ-GUESS they are mainly driven by drought intensity. Elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations alone did not buffer the ecosystems from carbon losses during UCEs in the majority of our simulations. Our findings highlight discrepancies in process formulations and uncertainties in models, notably related to availability in plant carbohydrate storage and the diversity of plant hydraulic schemes. This shows that different hypotheses of plant responses to UCEs exist in two similar models, reflecting knowledge gaps, which should be tested with gap-informed field experiments. This iterative modeling-experiment framework would help improve predictions of terrestrial ecosystem responses and climate feedbacks.</p>


Ecosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartwell H. Welsh ◽  
Adam K. Cummings ◽  
Garth R. Hodgson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document