Large-scale characteristics of flare-associated solar wind disturbances

1970 ◽  
Vol 75 (25) ◽  
pp. 4631-4642 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Hundhausen ◽  
S. J. Bame ◽  
M. D. Montgomery
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Петр Гололобов ◽  
Peter Gololobov ◽  
Прокопий Кривошапкин ◽  
Prokopy Krivoshapkin ◽  
Гермоген Крымский ◽  
...  

The observable anisotropy of cosmic rays has first been decomposed into zonal harmonics and components of vector and tensor anisotropy. We examine Forbush decreases in cosmic rays that occurred in November 2001 and November 2004. It is shown that at the beginning of a Forbush decrease an antisunward convective current of cosmic rays predominates; and during the recovery phase, a sunward diffusive current of particles along the interplanetary magnetic field dominates. During the phase of intensity drop, short-time decreases in the second zonal harmonic take place. These decreases occur with abrupt changes of the interplanetary magnetic field intensity and solar wind speed. During the passage of large-scale solar wind disturbances, the tensor anisotropy behaves in a complicated way. To explain its behavior, a further detailed investigation is required.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
Петр Гололобов ◽  
Peter Gololobov ◽  
Прокопий Кривошапкин ◽  
Prokopy Krivoshapkin ◽  
Гермоген Крымский ◽  
...  

The observable anisotropy of cosmic rays has first been decomposed into zonal harmonics and components of vector and tensor anisotropy. We examine Forbush decreases in cosmic rays that occurred in November 2001 and November 2004. It is shown that at the beginning of a Forbush decrease an antisunward convective current of cosmic rays predominates; and during the recovery phase, a sunward diffusive current of particles along the interplanetary magnetic field dominates. During the phase of intensity drop, short-time decreases in the second zonal harmonic take place. These decreases occur with abrupt changes of the interplanetary magnetic field intensity and solar wind speed. During the passage of large-scale solar wind disturbances, the tensor anisotropy behaves in a complicated way. To explain its behavior, a further detailed investigation is required.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Kumar Gupta ◽  
◽  
Puspraj Singh Puspraj Singh ◽  
Puspraj Singh Puspraj Singh ◽  
P. K. Chamadia P. K. Chamadia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Yermolaev ◽  
Irina Lodkina ◽  
Alexander Khokhlachev ◽  
Michael Yermolaev ◽  
Natalia Borodkova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Chhiber ◽  
Arcadi Usmanov ◽  
William Matthaeus ◽  
Melvyn Goldstein ◽  
Riddhi Bandyopadhyay

<div>Simulation results from a global <span>magnetohydrodynamic</span> model of the solar corona and the solar wind are compared with Parker Solar <span>Probe's</span> (<span>PSP</span>) observations during its first several orbits. The fully three-dimensional model (<span>Usmanov</span> <span>et</span> <span>al</span>., 2018, <span>ApJ</span>, 865, 25) is based on Reynolds-averaged mean-flow equations coupled with turbulence transport equations. The model accounts for effects of electron heat conduction, Coulomb collisions, Reynolds stresses, and heating of protons and electrons via nonlinear turbulent cascade. Turbulence transport equations for turbulence energy, cross <span>helicity</span>, and correlation length are solved concurrently with the mean-flow equations. We specify boundary conditions at the coronal base using solar synoptic <span>magnetograms</span> and calculate plasma, magnetic field, and turbulence parameters along the <span>PSP</span> trajectory. We also accumulate data from all orbits considered, to obtain the trends observed as a function of heliocentric distance. Comparison of simulation results with <span>PSP</span> data show general agreement. Finally, we generate synthetic fluctuations constrained by the local rms turbulence amplitude given by the model, and compare properties of this synthetic turbulence with PSP observations.</div>


2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 792-800
Author(s):  
N. S. Shlyk ◽  
A. V. Belov ◽  
M. A. Abunina ◽  
E. A. Eroshenko ◽  
A. A. Abunin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document