scholarly journals Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity.

1997 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Reber ◽  
Kenneth Kotovsky
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 920-928
Author(s):  
Derek M Ellis ◽  
B Hunter Ball ◽  
Nicole Kimpton ◽  
Gene A Brewer

Working memory processes are important for analytic problem-solving; however, their role in multiply-constrained problem-solving is currently debated. This study explored individual differences in working memory and successful completion of analytic and multiply-constrained problem-solving by having participants solve algebra and compound remote associate (CRAT) problems of varying difficulty under low and high memory demand conditions. Working memory was predictive of both algebra and multiply-constrained problem-solving. Specifically, participants with high working memory solved more problems than those with low working. Memory load did not differentially affect performance for low and high working memory participants. However, for multiply-constrained problem-solving the effect of item difficulty was more detrimental for high-span participants than low-span participants. Together, these findings suggest that working memory processes are important for both types of problem-solving and that participants with low working memory capacity may need to offload internal memory demands onto the environment to efficiently solve problems.


Author(s):  
Wim De Neys ◽  
Niki Verschueren

Abstract. The Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD) is an intriguing example of the discrepancy between people’s intuitions and normative reasoning. This study examines whether the notorious difficulty of the MHD is associated with limitations in working memory resources. Experiment 1 and 2 examined the link between MHD reasoning and working memory capacity. Experiment 3 tested the role of working memory experimentally by burdening the executive resources with a secondary task. Results showed that participants who solved the MHD correctly had a significantly higher working memory capacity than erroneous responders. Correct responding also decreased under secondary task load. Findings indicate that working memory capacity plays a key role in overcoming salient intuitions and selecting the correct switching response during MHD reasoning.


2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (S1) ◽  
pp. S17-S26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall W. Engle

2012 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Owens ◽  
Jim Stevenson ◽  
Julie A. Hadwin ◽  
Roger Norgate

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 1494-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Rolison ◽  
Jonathan St B. T. Evans ◽  
Clare R. Walsh ◽  
Ian Dennis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document