Review of The Evaluation of Composition Instruction (2nd ed.).

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 544-544
Author(s):  
Richard E. Snow
1986 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER SMAGORINSKY

1980 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Richard Hammer

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Kedersha McClay ◽  
Shelley Stagg Peterson

We report on two studies of teaching composition in Canadian elementary and middle-level classrooms, focusing this paper on teachers who work with new literacies perspectives.  A study of 21 teachers in all 10 Canadian provinces provided evidence of a broad range of practices in composition instruction, and an ongoing action research study with two groups of teachers allows us to develop richer understandings of the ways in which teachers create curriculum with students to promote engaged and productive multimodal and digital composing practices.  Nine themes are discussed within two broad categories: administrative and organizational issues, and teachers’ stances and views of selves as learners and collaborators.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-73
Author(s):  
Asaf Gayer

This study presents the material reconstruction of the unit on חכמת ידים‎—“Wisdom of the Hands,” in copy d of the wisdom composition Instruction (4Q418), followed by a complete transcription and an English translation. The study presents the location of nine fragments of 4Q418, placed on three consecutive columns, along with new joins and new readings. The reconstruction is based on the principles of the Stegemann method for the reconstruction of fragmentary scrolls, alongside new digital tools and software, as elaborated below. The new findings allow for a better understanding of the practical wisdom of Instruction, and provide new valuable data for future reconstruction of the entire composition.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Rowley ◽  
Patricia Carlson ◽  
Todd Miller

Four studies examined the effectiveness of user-adaptive computer-aided instruction that explicitly models the cognitive processes of composing for developmental writers, and is integrated with classroom composition instruction. The four school-year studies were designed to build on each other, each informing design improvements to a writing tutor named Reading and Writing in a Supportive Environment (R-WISE) as well as informing subsequent research designs. The first year study ( N = 852) compared traditional classroom controls with R-WISE treatment classrooms. The second year study ( N = 1,151) compared students using R-WISE with students using a word processor. The third year study ( N = 1,277) measured the effect of the teacher's instructional style, and the level of student control over the R-WISE software, on student performance. The fourth year study ( N = 617) replicated previous studies. The treatment groups for the four studies each posted significant gains over controls on most holistic and analytical measures of writing quality. The results of testing multiple design factors of R-WISE demonstrated the efficacy of long-term evaluation and enhancement of user-adaptive writing software in a field-based context.


1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-200
Author(s):  
Betty Jane Wagner

1990 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Bruce L. Edwards ◽  
Gail E. Hawisher ◽  
Cynthia L. Selfe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document