Integrated cognitive–behavioral and psychodynamic psychotherapy for intimate partner violent men.

Psychotherapy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Lawson ◽  
Melanie Kellam ◽  
Jamie Quinn ◽  
Stevie G. Malnar
Keyword(s):  
Psychodynamic Psychotherapy ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Violent Men ◽  
Partner Violent Men

scholarly journals A Proximal Change Experiment Testing Two Communication Exercises With Intimate Partner Violent Men

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia C. Babcock ◽  
Katherine Graham ◽  
Brittany Canady ◽  
Jody M. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Violent Men ◽  
Partner Violent Men

Cognitive behavioral and supportive group treatments for partner-violent men

2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M. Morrel ◽  
Jeffrey D. Elliott ◽  
Christopher M. Murphy ◽  
Casey T. Taft
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Group Treatments ◽  
Violent Men ◽  
Supportive Group ◽  
Partner Violent Men

Are Men With a History of Head Injury Less Responsive to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Intimate Partner Violence?

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia A. Akerele ◽  
Christopher M. Murphy ◽  
Megan R. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Head Injury ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Criminal Involvement ◽  
History Of ◽  
Violent Men ◽  
Partner Violent Men

Head injury is highly prevalent among intimate partner violence (IPV) offenders. This study investigates responsiveness to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for partner-violent men with and without a history of head injury using archival data on 310 males seeking IPV counseling at a community domestic violence agency. Participants reported on their history of head injury, age at injury, and length of time unconscious in a structured interview at program intake. Criminal justice outcomes were assessed for the 2-year period after scheduled completion of treatment using a publicly available state database. A significantly greater percentage of men with a history of head injury (N = 84) than those without (N = 226) had criminal involvement for incidents of partner abuse during the follow-up period. In addition, men with a history of moderate-to-severe head injury (n = 25) had more criminal involvement for general violence than those with no history of head injury. The findings highlight the need to screen partner-violent men for head injury and to develop and investigate intervention enhancements for those individuals.

Effects of Angry Rumination and Distraction in Intimate Partner Violent Men

2020 ◽  
pp. 088626051989733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia C. Babcock ◽  
Andrea L. Potthoff
Keyword(s):  
Physiological Arousal ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Intervention Strategies ◽  
State Anger ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Angry Rumination ◽  
Distorted Cognitions ◽  
Ipv Perpetration ◽  
Violent Men ◽  
Partner Violent Men

Although the tendency to ruminate is related to the frequency of intimate partner violent (IPV) perpetration, it is unclear how IPV men react emotionally and physiologically during angry rumination. This study is the first to experimentally manipulate rumination and distraction with violent men. Using the rumination and distraction paradigm developed by Nolen-Hoeksema and Morrow, IPV ( N = 87) and nonviolent (NV; N = 30) men underwent an anger induction and then were randomly assigned to either ruminate or distract. IPV men were hypothesized to experience increased effects of rumination compared to NV men. As predicted, the results demonstrate an increase in heart rate from baseline to postrumination. No change in physiological arousal was observed in the distraction condition over time. Surprisingly, no difference state anger was found between IPV and NV men, and both conditions resulted in an increase in state anger. Implications for battering interventions suggest that distraction strategies, such as taking a time-out, are not sufficient to decrease physiological arousal. Intervention strategies that address mindfulness, physiological soothing, distorted cognitions, and rumination may be more powerful in decreasing negative physiological arousal among IPV men.

scholarly journals Self-reported psychopathology profiles of high risk violent men with and without a history of physical intimate partner violence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Kelsi Laing
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Criminal History ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
History Of ◽  
Violent Men ◽  
Partner Violent Men

<p>Although intimate partner violent men have been found to be different from non-violent men on a number of variables, little research has compared partner violent men to men who engage in violence outside of relationships. The present research explored the similarities and differences between men with and without a history of physical partner violence within a sample of high risk violent men who attended New Zealands' High Risk Special Treatment Units. Pre-treatment psychopathology, measured on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III (MCMI-III;Millon, Davis, & Millon, 1997) was compared between these two groups and few differences were found. Comparisons on criminal history, criminal risk and change in dynamic risk also revealed no significant differences between these two groups. This research also explored whether similar or different psychopathology subtypes exist among men with and without a history of intimate partner violence. A latent profile analysis was conducted to examine psychopathology subtypes, and the proportions of men with and without a history of partner violence within each subtype were compared. The results showed that there were similar proportions of men from both groups within each of the subtypes, suggesting that men with and without a history of intimate partner violence share similar psychopathology profiles. The likelihood of reconviction or reimprisonment within 1 year of release from prison was also comapred between men with and without a history of intimate partner violence. The two groups were found to be reconvicted at a similar rate for any offence, violent offences, and were at a similar likelihood of being re-imprisoned. To conclude, the results suggest some similarity between men with and without a history of intimate partner violence, but future research should explore a wider range of factors that may distinguish between these two groups and inform whether men who engage in partner violence are unique from men who engage in other forms of violence.</p>

Judging the Book by Its Cover: What Comprises a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Program for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence?

2021 ◽  
pp. 009385482199602
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Wong ◽  
Jessica Bouchard
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Community Based Programs ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Partner Violent Men

Substantial literature has examined the effectiveness of intimate partner violence (IPV) interventions, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is noted as the second most common approach used in group interventions for partner violent men. However, as little research has examined how CBT principles are operationalized across program curricula, there is currently insufficient information from which to make recommendations for model CBT approaches in IPV interventions. In the current study, we review the literature to determine a set of core elements for comprehensive CBT interventions and use session-level curriculum data from 10 community-based programs to examine the presence of 14 components reflecting 4 CBT factors. Results suggest heterogeneity in the emphasis on CBT elements across programs, despite almost all managers listing CBT as a theoretical approach. Implications are discussed with a call for evaluators and meta-analysts to code for actual curriculum content as opposed to stated program labels.

Process and treatment adherence factors in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men.

2003 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 812-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey T. Taft ◽  
Christopher M. Murphy ◽  
Daniel W. King ◽  
Peter H. Musser ◽  
Judith M. DeDeyn
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Violent Men ◽  
Partner Violent Men
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document