Treating trauma and aggression with narrative exposure therapy in former child and adult soldiers: A randomized controlled trial in Eastern DR Congo.

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-155
Author(s):  
Anke Koebach ◽  
Samuel Carleial ◽  
Thomas Elbert ◽  
Sabine Schmitt ◽  
Katy Robjant
2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Ruf ◽  
Maggie Schauer ◽  
Frank Neuner ◽  
Claudia Catani ◽  
Elisabeth Schauer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole E Edgar ◽  
Alexandria Bennett ◽  
Nicole Santos Dunn ◽  
Sarah E MacLean ◽  
Simon Hatcher

Background: Annually, there are least 235,000 individuals experiencing homelessness in Canada. These individuals are more likely to have complex health issues, including mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Diagnosed PTSD rates in the homeless are more than double that of the general population, ranging between 21% and 53%. In the homeless population, complex PTSD (cPTSD) appears to be more common than PTSD. One treatment option for cPTSD is Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET), a brief trauma focused psychotherapy which attempts to place the trauma within a narrative of the person's life. Previous studies suggest NET may be an effective option for those who are homeless. In this study, our primary aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering community-based NET to individuals with PTSD who were homeless or vulnerably housed. Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled participants who were 18 years of age or older, currently homeless or vulnerably housed, and with active symptoms of PTSD. Participants were randomized to either NET alone or NET plus the addition of a genealogical assessment. Demographic and clinical data were collected at the baseline visit. Symptoms of PTSD, drug use and housing status were re-assessed at follow-up visits. Rates of referral, consent and retention were also examined as part of feasibility. Results: Twenty-two potential participants were referred to the study. Six were not able to be contacted, one was excluded prior to contact, and the remaining 15 consented to participate. Of these, one was a screen failure and 14 were randomized equally to the treatment arms. One randomized participant was withdrawn for safety. The main point of attrition was prior to starting therapy (3/13). Once therapy was initiated, retention was high with 80% of participants completing all six sessions of therapy. Seven participants completed all follow-up sessions. Conclusion: Delivering NET in a community-based setting and completing genealogical assessments was both feasible and acceptable to those who are homeless or vulnerably housed. Once therapy had been initiated, participants were likely to stay engaged. A large RCT should be conducted to evaluate effectiveness and feasibility on an increased scale.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document