Mimic me while playing! Social tolerance and rapid facial mimicry in macaques (Macaca tonkeana and Macaca fuscata).

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Scopa ◽  
Elisabetta Palagi

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Zannella ◽  
Roscoe Stanyon ◽  
Elisabetta Palagi


Stress ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Baptiste Sadoughi ◽  
Laurent Lacroix ◽  
Colette Berbesque ◽  
Hélène Meunier ◽  
Julia Lehmann


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kirkham ◽  
Ralph Pawling ◽  
Steven Tipper
Keyword(s):  


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marielle Stel ◽  
Roos Vonk
Keyword(s):  


1992 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Iwasaki ◽  
H. Yoshizawa ◽  
K. Suzuki


Author(s):  
Anna Elisabetta Galeotti ◽  
Federica Liveriero

AbstractTraditionally, an adequate strategy to deal with the tension between liberty and security has been toleration, for the latter allows the maximization of individual liberty without endangering security, since it embraces the limits set by the harm principle and the principle of self-defense of the liberal order. The area outside the boundary clearly requires repressive measures to protect the security and the rights of all. In this paper, we focus on the balance of liberty and security afforded by toleration, analyzing how this strategy works in highly conflictual contexts and sorting out the different sets of reason that might motivate individual to assume a tolerant attitude. We contend that toleration represents a reliable political solution to conflicts potentially threatening social security when it is coupled with social tolerance. Hence, we examine the reasons the agents may have for endorsing toleration despite disagreement and disapproval. In the range of these reasons, we argue that the right reasons are those preserving the moral and epistemic integrity of the agent. The right reasons are however not accessible to everyone, as for example is the case with (non-violent) religious fundamentalists. Only prudential reasons for toleration seem to be available to them. And yet, we argue that an open and inclusive democracy should in principle be hospitable towards prudential and pragmatic reasons as well, which may potentially lay the grounds for future cooperation. We conclude therefore that the tolerant society has room for the fundamentalists, granted that they do not resort to violence.



2021 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 115-136
Author(s):  
J.S. Martin ◽  
S.E. Koski ◽  
T. Bugnyar ◽  
A.V. Jaeggi ◽  
J.J.M. Massen


Economies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Osama Alhendi ◽  
József Tóth ◽  
Péter Lengyel ◽  
Péter Balogh

This study aims to examine the impact of social tolerance of cultural diversity, and the ability to speak widely spoken languages, on economic performance. Based on the literature, the evidence is still controversial and unclear. Therefore, the study used panel data relating to (99) non-English speaking economies during the time period between 2009 and 2017. Following the augmented Solow model approach, the related equation was expanded, in this study, to include (besides human capital) social tolerance, the English language (as a lingua franca) and the level of openness. The model was estimated using the two-step system GMM approach. The results show that social tolerance of diversity and English language competence have a positive, but insignificant impact on the economy. Regarding policy implications, government and decision-makers can avoid the costs deriving from cultural diversity by adopting democratic and effective institutions that aim to achieve cultural justice and recognition, which, in turn, enhance the level of tolerance, innovation and productivity in the economy. Moreover, to ease intercultural communication within heterogeneous communities, it is necessary to invest in enhancing the quality of second language education which is necessary to make society more tolerant and the country more open to the global economy.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document