scholarly journals Individual differences and fitting methods for the two-choice diffusion model of decision making.

Decision ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Ratcliff ◽  
Russ Childers
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Joslyn ◽  
Earl Hunt ◽  
Tom Sanquist

Author(s):  
Gerald Matthews ◽  
Lauren Reinerman-Jones ◽  
Shawn Burke ◽  
Grace Teo ◽  
David Scribner

Contemporary military operations require the US to partner with coalition nations, so that commanders must make effective decisions for multinational teams. The effectiveness of decision-making may depend on various factors. General decision-making competence and personality traits that promote interpersonal functioning may be advantageous in the team context. Sociocultural factors such as a strong nationalistic social identity may be harmful to decision-making in multinational teams. The current study ( N=696) examined correlates of a Situation Judgment Test (SJT) for multicultural decision-making ability in multiple samples. Predictors of better SJT performance included general decision-making ability, low nationalism, and various personality traits. Multivariate analyses discriminated multiple, independent predictors. Findings suggest assessment of the various strengths and weaknesses that shape the individual’s decision-making may inform training for multicultural competence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document