More Complicated Mental Tasks Interfere with Drivers' Ability to Detect and Discriminate Among Visual Targets: Spanish Study Tested Actual Highway Drivers; Also Showed Hands-Free Phone Conversations to Be as Safe--or as Risky--as Talking to a Passenger, Depending on the Demands of the Conversation

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Cabanac ◽  
Chantal Pouliot ◽  
James Everett

Previous work has shown that sensory pleasure is both the motor and the sign of optimal behaviors aimed at physiological ends. From an evolutionary psychology point of view it may be postulated that mental pleasure evolved from sensory pleasure. Accordingly, the present work tested empirically the hypothesis that pleasure signals efficacious mental activity. In Experiment 1, ten subjects played video-golf on a Macintosh computer. After each hole they were invited to rate their pleasure or displeasure on a magnitude estimation scale. Their ratings of pleasure correlated negatively with the difference par minus performance, i.e., the better the performance the greater the pleasure reported. In Experiments 2 and 3, the pleasure of reading poems was correlated with comprehension, both rated by two groups of subjects, science students and arts students. In the majority of science students pleasure was significantly correlated with comprehension. Only one arts student showed this relationship; this result suggests that the proposed relationship between pleasure and cognitive efficiency is not tautological. Globally, the results support the hypothesis that pleasure is aroused by the same mechanisms, and follows the same laws, in physiological and cognitive mental tasks and also leads to the optimization of performance.


Author(s):  
Sander Martens ◽  
Addie Johnson ◽  
Martje Bolle ◽  
Jelmer Borst

The human mind is severely limited in processing concurrent information at a conscious level of awareness. These temporal restrictions are clearly reflected in the attentional blink (AB), a deficit in reporting the second of two targets when it occurs 200–500 ms after the first. However, we recently reported that some individuals do not show a visual AB, and presented psychophysiological evidence that target processing differs between “blinkers” and “nonblinkers”. Here, we present evidence that visual nonblinkers do show an auditory AB, which suggests that a major source of attentional restriction as reflected in the AB is likely to be modality-specific. In Experiment 3, we show that when the difficulty in identifying visual targets is increased, nonblinkers continue to show little or no visual AB, suggesting that the presence of an AB in the auditory but not in the visual modality is not due to a difference in task difficulty.


Author(s):  
Ricardo Salgado Aranda ◽  
Nicasio Pérez Castellano ◽  
Óscar Cano Pérez ◽  
Andrés Ignacio Bodegas Cañas ◽  
Manuel Frutos López ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
C.J.E. Wientjes ◽  
P. Grossman ◽  
H. de Swart ◽  
A.W.K. Gaillard ◽  
P.B. Defares
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document