Why Don't Academic Psychologists Vote?

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane S. Halonen ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-311
Author(s):  
Trevor G. Mazzucchelli ◽  
Emma Burton ◽  
Lynne Roberts

2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 567-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
David DiLillo ◽  
Sarah DeGue ◽  
Lee M. Cohen ◽  
Robert D. Morgan

1978 ◽  
Vol 46 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1063-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Moss ◽  
Donald C. Butler

A faculty of psychologists is much more skeptical regarding the existence of ESP than beginning psychology students. The students, however, are unaware of this discrepancy. The greater acceptance of ESP by the students is due to cultural and psychological factors which encourage such beliefs. The skepticism of academic psychologists arises because the evidence for ESP has failed to meet generally accepted scientific standards. Among these are (1) a replicable experiment, (2) the elimination of more plausible explanations, (3) isolation of an independent variable, (4) a coherent theory, and (5) practical applications. Much of the research in ESP may be criticized because of the lack of accurate reporting, improper design, and inadequate controls. In view of these considerations behavioral scientists should make a public disavowal of belief in ESP.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Badenes-Ribera ◽  
Dolores Frias-Navarro ◽  
Nathalie O. Iotti ◽  
Amparo Bonilla-Campos ◽  
Claudio Longobardi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document