Scholarly productivity, impact, and quality among Academic Psychologists at Group of Eight Universities

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavan P. McNally
Keyword(s):  
Scholarly Productivity ◽  
Academic Psychologists

Scholarly productivity and citation impact of Australian academic psychologists

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-311
Author(s):  
Trevor G. Mazzucchelli ◽  
Emma Burton ◽  
Lynne Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Citation Impact ◽  
Scholarly Productivity ◽  
Academic Psychologists

scholarly journals Scholarly productivity and citation impact of academic psychologists in Group of Eight universities

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Haslam ◽  
Michelle Stratemeyer ◽  
Adriana Vargas-Sáenz
Keyword(s):  
Citation Impact ◽  
Scholarly Productivity ◽  
Academic Psychologists

Scholarly productivity in behavior analysis: The most prolific authors and institutions from 1992 to 2001.

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Shabani ◽  
James E. Carr ◽  
Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir ◽  
Barbara E. Esch ◽  
Jill N. Gillett
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Analysis ◽  
Scholarly Productivity ◽  
Prolific Authors

scholarly journals The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 237802312110069
Author(s):  
Molly M. King ◽  
Megan E. Frederickson
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Change ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Scientific Productivity ◽  
Women Scientists ◽  
Gender Composition ◽  
Social Forces ◽  
Scholarly Productivity ◽  
Workplace Productivity ◽  
Underrepresentation Of Women

Academia serves as a valuable case for studying the effects of social forces on workplace productivity, using a concrete measure of output: scholarly papers. Many academics, especially women, have experienced unprecedented challenges to scholarly productivity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The authors analyze the gender composition of more than 450,000 authorships in the arXiv and bioRxiv scholarly preprint repositories from before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis reveals that the underrepresentation of women scientists in the last authorship position necessary for retention and promotion in the sciences is growing more inequitable. The authors find differences between the arXiv and bioRxiv repositories in how gender affects first, middle, and sole authorship submission rates before and during the pandemic. A review of existing research and theory outlines potential mechanisms underlying this widening gender gap in productivity during COVID-19. The authors aggregate recommendations for institutional change that could ameliorate challenges to women’s productivity during the pandemic and beyond.

scholarly journals Uncovering Disparities in Scholarly Productivity among Junior Surgical Society Grant Recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 128-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Riccardi ◽  
Nicole I. Farber ◽  
Vanessa Ho ◽  
Stephanie L. Bonne
Keyword(s):  
Scholarly Productivity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document