Mental Health Parity Act: Despite new federal standards, mental health benefits remain limited: Chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate

2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Druss ◽  
Carolyn Levinson ◽  
Steven Marcus

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Robinson ◽  
◽  
Lisa Chimento ◽  
Stacey Bush ◽  
John Papay

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Bonetto ◽  
Sylvain Delouvée ◽  
Yara Mahfud ◽  
Jais Adam-Troian

Social distancing and mass quarantines were implemented worldwide in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Prior research on the effects of social isolation has shown that such measures bear negative consequences for population health and well-being. Conversely, a growing body of evidence suggests that feeling positively identified with a group is associated with a range of physical and mental health benefits. This effect is referred to as the social cure and generalizes to various identities. In line with these findings, this study tested whether national identification could promote wellbeing and physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic. To do so, we used survey data conducted among 67 countries (N = 46,450) which included measures of wellbeing, national identification, and subjective physical health. Mixed-model analyses revealed that national identity was indeed associated with wellbeing - despite adjustment on social belonging, COVID-19 perceived risk, exposure, and ideology. This effect did not extend to subjective health. These results suggest that the mere feeling of belonging to a national group may have mental health benefits and could be leveraged by governments. We discuss the implications of our findings within the social cure framework and their relevance for population mental health under COVID-19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document