Getting even, or not: Interpersonal transgressions, anger, and revenge

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene M. Stillwell ◽  
Regan E. Del Priore
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Orth ◽  
Matthias Berking ◽  
Nadine Walker ◽  
Laurenz Meier ◽  
Hansjorg Znoj

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana M. Beltrán-Morillas ◽  
Inmaculada Valor-Segura ◽  
Francisca Expósito

AbstractInterpersonal transgressions often threaten the stability of the relationship. Within the scope of romantic relationships, physical violence and sexual infidelity have been considered the most difficult transgressions to forgive. Similarly, two variables considered relevant for forgiveness within the context of the couple are partner-specific dependency and the guilt experienced by the offended person. In that way, this research aims to approach the understanding of the forgiveness process of such transgressions. To this end, an experimental study was designed (N= 173 university women;Mage= 21.36,SD= 2.83), by which three indicators of forgiveness corresponding to the Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivations Scale–18–Item Form (TRIM–18; “Revenge”, “Avoidance” and “Benevolence”), partner-specific dependency and sense of guilt of the offended person were examined in the face of the transgressions of physical violence and sexual infidelity. Results revealed that violence (vs. infidelity) is less forgiven (higher “Revenge”,p= .017, ηp2= .034). In addition, the results showed that high partner-specific dependency leads to further guilt which, in turn, leads to greater forgiveness towards the partner (less “Avoidance”,CIE= –.094,SE= .042, 95% CI [–.201, –.029]; and higher “Benevolence”,CIE= .080,SE= .037, 95% CI [.024, .173]) in light of violence (vs. infidelity). Last but not least, the previous findings and their possible implications for romantic relationships are discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. McCullough ◽  
Paul Orsulak ◽  
Anna Brandon ◽  
Linda Akers

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-130
Author(s):  
Alison P. Onody ◽  
Lydia Woodyatt ◽  
Michael Wenzel ◽  
Mikaela Cibich ◽  
Amanda Sheldon ◽  
...  

Ideally, following an interpersonal transgression an offender will accept responsibility, work through guilt or shame, and be willing to reconcile with the victim. However, this process can be thwarted by defensiveness or self-condemnation. We tested whether humility was associated with increased self-forgiveness, decreased self-condemnation and defensiveness, and increased willingness to reconcile. In Study 1 ( N = 302), we found trait humility was associated with higher levels of trait self-forgiveness directly and indirectly via reduced defensiveness (but not self-condemnation). In Study 2 ( N = 194), we found that trait and state humility were associated with higher levels of self-forgiveness directly and indirectly via reduced defensiveness, and through both of these, humility was positively associated with willingness to reconcile. There was also a weak positive indirect effect of humility on willingness to reconcile via reduced self-condemnation. These studies suggest that humility, long ignored in forgiveness studies, might play several crucial roles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document