We think (our values are different from theirs), therefore i am. An intersubjective consensus perspective on regulatory focus and social desirable responding

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sau-lai Lee ◽  
Chi-yue Chiu ◽  
Kim-pong Tam ◽  
Yee-man Ivy Lau
2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Allbutt ◽  
Jonathan Ling ◽  
Thomas M. Heffernan ◽  
Mohammed Shafiullah

Allbutt, Ling, and Shafiullah (2006) and Allbutt, Shafiullah, and Ling (2006) found that scores on self-report measures of visual imagery experience correlate primarily with the egoistic form of social-desirable responding. Here, three studies are reported which investigated whether this pattern of findings generalized to the ratings of imagery vividness in the auditory modality, a new version of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire ( Marks, 1995 ), and reports of visual thinking style. The measure of social-desirable responding used was the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR; Paulhus, 2002 ). Correlational analysis replicated the pattern seen in our earlier work and of the correlations with the egoistic bias, the correlation with vividness of visual imagery was largest and significant, the correlation with visual thinking style next largest and approached significance, and the correlation with vividness of auditory imagery was the smallest and not significant. The size of these correlations mirrored the extent to which the three aspects of imagery were valued by participants.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford R. Haimann ◽  
Lois E. Tetrick
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heleen van Mierlo ◽  
Edwin A. J. van Hooft ◽  
Christopher O. L. H. Porter

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Ramsey ◽  
Russell E. Johnson ◽  
James A. Tan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document