Society's Grand Challenges: Insights from Psychological Science: Health Disparities

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Azar
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique Constance-Huggins ◽  
Ashley Davis

The American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare established 12 social work grand challenges to address critical social problems in America. Some of these social problems include health disparities, income inequality, and the lack of social justice, among others. These social problems are deep and daunting especially for people of color. Tackling these challenges would require a focus on the racial attitudes in society, such as color-blind racial attitudes, that maintain the power structure that fuels inequality. This article introduces color-blind racial attitudes and discusses their impact on social work practice and policy. Lastly, it presents strategies for addressing color-blind racial attitudes related to the grand challenges.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
NiCole Buchanan ◽  
Marisol Perez ◽  
Mitch Prinstein ◽  
Idia Thurston

As efforts to end systemic racism gain momentum across various contexts, it is critical to consider anti-racist steps that will be required to improve psychological science. Current scientific practices serve to maintain white supremacy with significant and impactful consequences. Extant research practices reinforce norms of homogeneity within BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color) populations, segregate theories and methods derived from BIPOC groups, apply disparate standards to the evaluation of research on White vs. BIPOC populations, and discourage BIPOC scholars from pursuing research careers. Perhaps consequently, mental and physical health disparities remain largely unimproved. In this article we present examples of how epistemic oppression exists within psychological science, including how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. Specific recommendations are offered for many stakeholders, including those involved in the production, reporting, and gatekeeping of science as well as consumers of science. Additionally, we present a diversity accountability index for journals with potential benchmarks for measuring progress as one strategy to promote dialogue and action, challenge inequity, and upend the influence of white supremacy in psychological science.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
Scott Burris
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Gantman ◽  
Robin Gomila ◽  
Joel E. Martinez ◽  
J. Nathan Matias ◽  
Elizabeth Levy Paluck ◽  
...  

AbstractA pragmatist philosophy of psychological science offers to the direct replication debate concrete recommendations and novel benefits that are not discussed in Zwaan et al. This philosophy guides our work as field experimentalists interested in behavioral measurement. Furthermore, all psychologists can relate to its ultimate aim set out by William James: to study mental processes that provide explanations for why people behave as they do in the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document