Some effects of single alternation training of rats in a double runway.

1972 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Pavlik ◽  
J. J. Franchina ◽  
D. L. East ◽  
O. R. Evans
1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1311-1316
Author(s):  
Richard J. Nicholls ◽  
Victor Duch

Four groups of rats were given single-alternation training in a runway using sucrose reward and then extinguished. Only subjects given training with a short interval (10 sec.) between rewarded and nonrewarded trials and a long interval (40 min.) between nonrewarded and rewarded trials learned patterned responding. This duplicated the results found in classical conditioning with a similar manipulation. The acquisition and extinction data led to the conclusion that intertrial interval cues can be made more important than aftereffects in producing patterning with sucrose reinforcement.


1966 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 329-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce H. Harris ◽  
Garth J. Thomas
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Burns ◽  
Susan E. Griner
Keyword(s):  

1963 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 783-797
Author(s):  
Eugene Linker ◽  
Bruce M. Ross

Three experiments are described dealing with solution attempts for single, double, and quadruple alternations in one or two of three possible symbol-sequence classification dimensions. Results showed that alternation length did not alter solution difficulty. The conclusion is formulated that the way in which Ss tackled alternation problems could not lead to solutions on the basis of “reading off” from memory or learning on an incremental basis. Therefore the concept of an hypothesis must be brought in to account for Ss with incomplete evidence often obtaining successful solutions and yet not differing in problem-solving approach from nonsolvers. There is also some indication that single alternation may be easier than double alternation when coding of symbol sequences is most straightforward, but there is no indication of any circumstances that favor double over quadruple alternation.


1980 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Stanton ◽  
William Dailey ◽  
Abram Amsel
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 541???544 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Donald ◽  
D. E. McMillan
Keyword(s):  

1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-234
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Davis ◽  
Bobby R. Brown

16 female, albino rats served as Ss in an investigation of performance on single and double-alternation sequences of reward-nonreward. Ss were run in an operant conditioning chamber with a 24-hr. intenrial interval. The results indicated that Ss receiving the single-alternation reward-nonreward sequence learned to respond appropriately, i.e., fast on reward days, slow on nonreward days, while Ss run under the double-alternation sequence did not exhibit appropriate responding. The results are seen as being supportive of Capaldi's sequential hypothesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document