Reward magnitude in differential conditioning: Effects of sequential variables in acquisition and extinction.

1974 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1141-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger L. Mellgren ◽  
Dennis G. Dyck
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah R. Zinner ◽  
Eddie Harmon-Jones ◽  
Patricia G. Devine ◽  
David M. Amodio

1978 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Prytula ◽  
Stephen F. Davis ◽  
James W. Voorhees
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene D. Steinhauer

Numerous prior studies have reported that rats, pigeons, and humans prefer predictable over unpredictable rewards of equal frequency and magnitude. A frustration-theory analysis of this preference suggests that it obtains because the unpredictable partial reinforcement procedure is aversive whereas the predictable discrimination procedure loses its aversiveness. The preference, on such an analysis, arises due to the tendency to avoid the unpredictable of two alternatives. Since frustration varies as a function of magnitude of reward, the avoidance tendency should increase with increases in reward magnitude in the unpredictable alternative. One group of rats in the present study showed a clear preference for seven versus five 45-mg Noyes Pellets. A second group showed the oft reported preference for five pellets predictable versus five pellets unpredictable. A third group of rats showed a preference for a five-pellet predictable reward over a seven-pellet unpredictable reward. The results of this experiment provide evidence for a frustration-theory analysis of the preference for predictable reward.


1964 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Donovick ◽  
Leonard E. Ross

The present investigation was concerned with the reduction of inhibition associated with the negative discriminandum in a single stimulus discrimination learning situation. In Phase I 33 female rats were trained on a black-white discrimination problem. In the second phase Ss were divided into three groups which received: (a) 100% reinforcement to both the old positive and negative discriminanda; (b) four trials per day to the old negative, 100% reward; (c) eight trials per day to the old negative, 100% reward. As in previous studies, which employed simultaneous discrimination learning conditions, speed to the old negative remained significantly below speed to the old positive in the second phase. However, unlike the previous results, the difference decreased over trials. No differences were found between the groups that had trials to the old negative cue only, or between these groups and either speed to the old positive or the old negative in the case of the group receiving reward on both cues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document