Choice behavior and differential response strength in discrimination reversal learning.

1959 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Davenport
2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Beran ◽  
Emily D. Klein ◽  
Theodore A. Evans ◽  
Betty Chan ◽  
Timothy M. Flemming ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill F. Elias

Spatial discrimination reversal learning was explored for mice genetically selected for high brain weight and unselected controls with lower brain weights. Control-line Ss escaped from a water maze more rapidly, but high-line Ss made fewer errors and took less trials to reach criterion on the first reversal. Control-line Ss were unable to complete more than 1 reversal, while high-line Ss all completed at least 7 reversals. This positive relation between reversal learning and brain size is consistent with comparisons among species and experiments manipulating brain size by means of drugs or surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document