scholarly journals Problem recognition and treatment beliefs relate to mental health utilization among veteran primary care patients.

Author(s):  
Emily M. Johnson ◽  
Kyle Possemato

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Floyd ◽  
Delilah O. Noronha ◽  
Steven Lindley


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-226
Author(s):  
Stephanie N. Miller ◽  
Christopher J. Monahan ◽  
Kristin M. Phillips ◽  
Daniel Agliata ◽  
Ronald J. Gironda


2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary W. Lu ◽  
Kathleen F. Carlson ◽  
Jonathan P. Duckart ◽  
Steven K. Dobscha




2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph W. Swindle ◽  
Jaya K. Rao ◽  
Ahdy Helmy ◽  
Laurie Plue ◽  
X. H. Zhou ◽  
...  

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of integrating generalist and specialist care for veterans with depression. Method: We conducted a randomized trial of patients screening positive for depression at two Veterans Affairs Medical Center general medicine clinic firms. Control firm physicians were notified prior to the encounter when eligible patients had PRIME-MD depression diagnoses. In the intervention firm, a mental health clinical nurse specialist (CNS) was to: design a treatment plan; implement that plan with the primary care physician; and monitor patients via telephone or visits at two weeks, one month and two months. Primary outcomes (depressive symptoms, patient satisfaction with health care) were collected at 3 and 12 months. Results: Of 268 randomized patients, 246 (92%) and 222 (83%) completed 3- and 12-month follow-up interviews. There were no between-group differences in depressive symptoms or satisfaction at 3 or 12 months. The intervention group had greater chart documentation of depression at baseline (63% versus 33%, p = 0.003) and a higher referral rate to mental health services at 3 months (27% versus 9%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in the rate of new prescriptions for, or adequate dosing of, anti-depressant medications. In 40% of patients, CNSs disagreed with the PRIME-MD depression diagnosis, and their rates of watchful waiting were correspondingly high. Conclusions: Implementing an integrated care model did not occur as intended. Experienced CNSs often did not see the need for treatment in many primary care patients identified by the PRIME-MD. Integrating integrated care models in actual practice may prove challenging.



Medical Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley D. Stein ◽  
Robin Meili ◽  
Terri L. Tanielian ◽  
David J. Klein


1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Zimmerman ◽  
David T. Lush ◽  
Neil J. Farber ◽  
Jon Hartung ◽  
Gary Plescia ◽  
...  

Objective: The authors examined whether there is empirical support for the notion that medical patients are upset by being asked questions about psychiatric disorders. Method: Six hundred and one patients attending a primary care clinic completed the SCREENER—a newly developed, brief self-administered questionnaire that surveys a broad range of psychopathology. In addition, they completed a second questionnaire that assessed their attitudes toward the SCREENER. Results: We found a high level of acceptance by patients. The questions were judged easy to answer, and they rarely aroused significant negative affect. Fewer than 2 percent of the patients judged the questions difficult to answer, and fewer than 3 percent were “very much” embarrassed, upset, annoyed, or uncomfortable with the questions. Individuals with a history of psychiatric treatment and poorer current mental health reacted more unfavorably to the questionnaire. Conclusions: From the patient's perspective, it is feasible and acceptable to use self-administered questionnaires for routine screening of psychiatric problems in primary care settings.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document