Nurses’ Global Assessment of Suicide Risk Scale--German Version

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Kozel ◽  
Manuela Grieser ◽  
Christoph Abderhalden ◽  
John R. Cutcliffe
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Kozel ◽  
Manuela Grieser ◽  
Christoph Abderhalden ◽  
John R. Cutcliffe

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Ferrera ◽  
Stefano Terzoni ◽  
Armando D'Agostino ◽  
John R. Cutcliffe ◽  
Yelissa Pozo Falen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark van Veen ◽  
Inge van Weeghel ◽  
Bauke Koekkoek ◽  
Arjan W. Braam

Author(s):  
J. A. Motto ◽  
◽  
D. C. Heilbron ◽  
R. P. Juster
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tero Taiminen ◽  
Jukka Huttunen ◽  
Hannele Heila ◽  
Markus Henriksson ◽  
Erkki Isometsa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Modai ◽  
M. Ritsner ◽  
R. Kurs ◽  
S. Mendel ◽  
A. Ponizovsky

SummaryBackgroundMedically serious suicide attempts have been recognized as the most important predictor of suicide. The Computerized Suicide Risk Scale based on backpropagation neural networks (CSRS-BP) has been recently found efficient in the detection of records of patients who performed medically serious suicide attempts (MSSA).ObjectivesTo validate the CSRS-BP by: 1) using the CSRS-BP with patients instead of records; 2) comparing the ability of expert psychiatrists to detect MSSA, using the CSRS checklist; and 3) comparing the results of the Risk Estimator for Suicide (RES) and the self-rating Suicide Risk Scale (SRS) with the CSRS-BP.MethodsTwo hundred fifty psychiatric inpatients (35 MSSA and 215 non-MSSA) were diagnosed by clinicians using the SCID DSM-IV. Three expert psychiatrists completed the CSRS checklist, and the RES for each patient, and the patients completed the self-report SRS assessment scale. The CSRS-BP was run for each patient. Five other expert psychiatrists assessed the CSRS checklists and estimated the probability of MSSA for each patient. Comparisons of sensitivity and specificity rates between CSRS-BP, assessment scales and experts were done.ResultsInitially, the CSRS-BP, RES, SRS, and experts performed poorly. Although sensitivity and specificity rates significantly improved (two to four times) after the inclusion of information regarding the number of previous suicide attempts in the input data set, results still remained insignificant.ConclusionsThe CSRS-BP, which was very successful in the detection of MSSA patient records, failed to detect MSSA patients in face-to-face interviews. Information regarding previous suicide attempts is an important MSSA predictor, but remains insufficient for the detection of MSSA in individual patients. The detection rate of the SRS and RES scales was also poor and could therefore not identify MSSA patients or be used to validate the CSRS-BP.


2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Ximena Rangel-Garzón ◽  
María Fernanda Suárez-Beltrán ◽  
Franklin Escobar-Córdoba

<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Antecedentes.</strong> El médico de atención primaria debe decidir qué hacer con un paciente que ha atentado contra su vida o manifiesta ideación suicida. Posiblemente puede interconsultar a psiquiatría; sin embargo, ocasionalmente esto se difiere. </span></p><p class="p1"><strong>Objetivo.</strong> Encontrar un instrumento de evaluación del riesgo suicida en adultos que pueda ser aplicado por el médico general en el servicio de urgencias.</p><p class="p1"><strong>Materiales y métodos.</strong> Revisión de la literatura en PubMed con los términos MeSH: ‘suicide’, ‘risk assessment’ y ‘scales’; se encontraron 270 artículos a los que se les analizaron los abstract y finalmente se incluyeron 24 estudios. </p><p class="p1"><strong>Resultados.</strong> Se encontraron nueve instrumentos y se descartaron los demás por involucrar diagnóstico específico, grupos de edad distintos, poblaciones específicas diferentes, tiempo prolongado de aplicación y otros determinantes enfocados en los factores protectores y en opiniones del paciente acerca del suicidio.  </p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><strong>Conclusiones. </strong>Estas escalas se pueden usar como instrumento de ayuda para definir una conducta en un paciente con riesgo suicida, pero no reemplazan la entrevista psiquiátrica. Se postulan las escalas Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation y Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale por cumplir con las características psicométricas, por tener un tiempo de aplicación adecuado en el servicio de urgencias y por sus preguntas sencillas para ser utilizadas en atención primaria.</span></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Won Park ◽  
Jong-Ha Lee ◽  
Eun-Kyoung Lee ◽  
Jae-Jun Song ◽  
Hong-Seok Park ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document