Language Screening Test

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constance Flamand-Roze ◽  
Bruno Falissard ◽  
Emmanuel Roze ◽  
Lisa Maintigneux ◽  
Jonathan Beziz ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bourgeois-Marcotte ◽  
C. Flamand-Roze ◽  
C. Denier ◽  
L. Monetta

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Feeney ◽  
John Bernthal

The purpose of this study was to determine the number of false positives and false negatives derived from the language domain of the Revised Denver Developmental Screening Test (RDDST) in a community preschool screening. Six months after the initial screening, 199 RDDST protocols were reviewed and the status of each child was documented. The study identified nine false positives and three false negatives, which resulted in a positive hit rate of 93.5 %. The results of the study indicate that the RDDST is an effective tool in predicting the need for formal assessment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Seyyede Zohreh Mousavi ◽  
◽  
Reyhaneh Jafari ◽  
Saman Maroufizadeh3 ◽  
Mohammad Moez Shahramnia ◽  
...  

Background & Objectives: Aphasia is one of the most common consequences of a stroke; thus, screening tests for early diagnosis of the problem are necessary when dealing with aphasia patients. One of these screening tests is the Language Screening Test (LAST). The purpose of this study was to translate, validate, and utilize this test in the Persian language for patients after stroke. Methods: The original version of LAST was translated into Persian, and then administrated on 100 patients in the acute phase by two examiners at the patient’s bedside in order to check the inter-rater reliability. To assess the agreement between the two forms (a and b) of the LAST, Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), weighted Kappa, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used. Also, the Persian version of LAST and the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) were performed at the chronic phase with two independent examiners with blind scoring. Results: Inter-rater reliability between Rater 1 and Rater 2 on LAST-a and LAST-b score were very good for both phases. The CCC for LAST-a and LAST-b, respectively, were 0.874 and 0.865 for the acute phase and 0.923 and 0.927 for the chronic phase. The weighted Kappa for LAST-a and LAST-b, respectively, were 0.750 and 0.740 for the acute phase, and 0.822 and 0.846 for the chronic phase. Conclusion: The obtained results showed that LAST is a very simple, fast, and valid test and can be used as a reliable tool in stroke patients. Lack of cultural and language dependency are the advantages of using this test.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-916
Author(s):  
Philip R. Nader

The article by Schwartz and Murphy1 in the May 1975 issue emphasizes the key position of the pediatrician in recognition of speech and language disorders, as well as the lack of training of health professionals in this important area of development. We would like to call attention to a five-minute screening test appropriate for children 6 months to 6 years of age. The Physician's Developmental Quick Screen for Speech Disorders (PDQ)2 is designed for use by non-speech pathologists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document