The experiential effect of kindergarten on Bankson language screening test performance

1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 469-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Larson ◽  
Patricia A. Summers
1964 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar A. Parsons ◽  
Harriet I. Maslow ◽  
Freda Morris ◽  
J. Peter Denny

The Trail Making Test, previously reported highly effective in differentiating brain-damaged from non-brain-damaged Ss, was administered to 21 brain-damaged Ss and 63 non-brain-damaged Ss. Since the latter Ss performed at a level indistinguishable from that of the brain-damaged Ss, several studies were designed in an attempt to “explain” the poor performance of the non-brain-damaged Ss. The possible effects of behavioral agitation, anxiety, examiner differences, facility with letters of the alphabet, order of administration, and ego-involvement were investigated. Only anxiety was found to be significantly related to performance. However, in other analyses age, education, vocabulary, and degree of psychiatric disturbance were significantly related to performance. Until these variables are considered in the scoring system, it seems unlikely that the TMT will be effective as a general screening test for brain-damage.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bourgeois-Marcotte ◽  
C. Flamand-Roze ◽  
C. Denier ◽  
L. Monetta

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1342-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanda Horeweg ◽  
Ernst Th Scholten ◽  
Pim A de Jong ◽  
Carlijn M van der Aalst ◽  
Carla Weenink ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Feeney ◽  
John Bernthal

The purpose of this study was to determine the number of false positives and false negatives derived from the language domain of the Revised Denver Developmental Screening Test (RDDST) in a community preschool screening. Six months after the initial screening, 199 RDDST protocols were reviewed and the status of each child was documented. The study identified nine false positives and three false negatives, which resulted in a positive hit rate of 93.5 %. The results of the study indicate that the RDDST is an effective tool in predicting the need for formal assessment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Seyyede Zohreh Mousavi ◽  
◽  
Reyhaneh Jafari ◽  
Saman Maroufizadeh3 ◽  
Mohammad Moez Shahramnia ◽  
...  

Background & Objectives: Aphasia is one of the most common consequences of a stroke; thus, screening tests for early diagnosis of the problem are necessary when dealing with aphasia patients. One of these screening tests is the Language Screening Test (LAST). The purpose of this study was to translate, validate, and utilize this test in the Persian language for patients after stroke. Methods: The original version of LAST was translated into Persian, and then administrated on 100 patients in the acute phase by two examiners at the patient’s bedside in order to check the inter-rater reliability. To assess the agreement between the two forms (a and b) of the LAST, Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), weighted Kappa, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used. Also, the Persian version of LAST and the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) were performed at the chronic phase with two independent examiners with blind scoring. Results: Inter-rater reliability between Rater 1 and Rater 2 on LAST-a and LAST-b score were very good for both phases. The CCC for LAST-a and LAST-b, respectively, were 0.874 and 0.865 for the acute phase and 0.923 and 0.927 for the chronic phase. The weighted Kappa for LAST-a and LAST-b, respectively, were 0.750 and 0.740 for the acute phase, and 0.822 and 0.846 for the chronic phase. Conclusion: The obtained results showed that LAST is a very simple, fast, and valid test and can be used as a reliable tool in stroke patients. Lack of cultural and language dependency are the advantages of using this test.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constance Flamand-Roze ◽  
Bruno Falissard ◽  
Emmanuel Roze ◽  
Lisa Maintigneux ◽  
Jonathan Beziz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document