scholarly journals Correction: Residential dust lead levels and the risk of childhood lead poisoning in United States children

Author(s):  
Joseph M. Braun ◽  
Kimberly Yolton ◽  
Nicholas Newman ◽  
David E. Jacobs ◽  
Mark Taylor ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Braun ◽  
Kimberly Yolton ◽  
Nicholas Newman ◽  
David E. Jacobs ◽  
Mark Taylor ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Braun ◽  
K. Yolton ◽  
N. Newman ◽  
D. Jacobs ◽  
M. Taylor ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 614-618
Author(s):  
Deborah E. Glotzer ◽  
Howard Bauchner

Published recommendations (1985) for the management of childhood lead poisoning suggest the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)provocation testing and chelation as the mainstay of treatment for blood lead levels between 25 and 55 μg/dL. Since 1985 evidence has accumulated indicating that (1) levels of blood lead less than 25 μg/dL are detrimental to cognitive development, (2) EDTA provocation testing may result in potentially harmful shifts in the body lead burden, and (3) oral agents such as penicillamine and 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid are effective in reducing elevated lead levels. To determine how this evidence impacts on the management of childhood lead poisoning, the authors surveyed the lead poisoning clinics of pediatric departments in the cities estimated by the United States Public Health Service to have the largest number of children affected by lead poisoning. Thirty (70%) of 43 surveys were completed. Respondents indicated that the lowest blood lead level for which they would use a chelating agent to reduce the lead burden was as follows: 50 μg/dL (3%), 45 μg/dL (3%), 40μg/dL (13%) 35 μg/dL (3%), 30 μg/dL (27%), 25 μg/dL (47%) and 20μg/dL (3%). For all blood lead levels from 20 through 55 μg/dL, EDTA was the most frequently recommended chelating agent (chelation and provocation testing). Fifteen percent of responding lead clinics do not use the provocation test under any circumstances. For a child with a negative EDTA provocation test, the percentage of respondents recommending the use of any chelation therapy ranged from 16% for blood lead levels of 25 through 29μg/dL to 66% for levels of 50 through 55 μg/dL. Orally active chelating agents are used by fewer than one third of the responding lead clinics and were selected as the chelating agent of choice at all blood lead levels from 25 through 55 μg/dL by at least one respondent. The results of this survey indicate the following: (1) There is a wide range of blood lead levels for which chelation therapy is recommended. (2) The majority of children with elevated lead burdens are managed using EDTA. (3) The EDTA provocation test continues to be widely used. (4) The majority of children with blood lead levels of 25 through 44 μg/dL with negative provocation tests do not receive chelation therapy. (5) Orally active chelating agents are used in the minority of lead clinics. (6) No common approach for the treatment of lead toxicity appears to exist. (7) In the majority of pediatric centers, current management of blood lead elevation does not appear to reflect new information regarding the effects and treatment of lead poisoning.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-510
Author(s):  
Sergio Piomelli

Lead is an extremely toxic metal: even a single atom of lead, once in the human body, binds to a protein and induces some damage; the greater the exposure, the more serious the effects. Lead has no physiological function; any amount of body lead reflects environmental pollution.1 In the 1990s, in the United States, is lead poisoning a devastating environmental threat to our children or is childhood lead poisoning a threat of the past? Probably neither of these statements is correct. It may be worthwhile to look at the current situation in detail. In the 1970s, before efforts were made to reduce environmental lead, common effects in children of the widespread environmental contamination with lead were encephalopathy and even death.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-161
Author(s):  
V. J. Kattapong ◽  
K. M. Garbarino ◽  
P. M. Duncan ◽  
J. K. Carney

1979 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Baker ◽  
P J Landrigan ◽  
A G Barbour ◽  
D H Cox ◽  
D S Folland ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Jones ◽  
Mario Covarrubias Pérez ◽  
Bret Ericson ◽  
Daniel Estrada Sánchez ◽  
Sandra Gualtero ◽  
...  

Background. Lead exposure within artisanal ceramics workshop communities in Mexico continues to be a major source of childhood lead poisoning. Artisanal ceramics workshops expose children through direct ingestion, contaminated soil, and food prepared in lead-glazed pottery. Conversion to non-lead glazes alone may not effectively reduce exposure. This paper describes a model comprehensive intervention and environmental remediation of an artisanal ceramics workshop in the state of Hidalgo, Mexico. Objectives. The purpose of the project was to evaluate the effectiveness of environmental interventions—including removal of lead-contaminated equipment, soil and pottery—on childhood blood lead levels. Methods. A typical artisanal workshop using lead glaze was identified and assessed for lead contamination. Baseline blood lead levels (BLL) were taken from 5 children inhabiting the workshop prior to remediation. Follow-up paired BLL were taken 3- and 12-months post-remediation and results compared. Results. A mean 54% decrease in BLL within 3 months of remediation and a 57% decrease within 1 year was observed. Conclusions. This project shows the effectiveness of environmental lead remediation at artisanal Mexican ceramics workshops for purposes of sustained BLL reductions. Application of the methods presented in this paper to other ceramics workshops using lead glaze in central Mexico will likely help to further reduce childhood lead poisoning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document