scholarly journals Comprehensive analysis of complications after transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis: results of a multicenter trial with 30 days’ follow-up

Author(s):  
Tobias Kohl ◽  
August Sigle ◽  
Timur Kuru ◽  
Johannes Salem ◽  
Hanjo Rolfs ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To investigate infectious and non-infectious complications after transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) without antibiotic prophylaxis in a multicenter cohort. Secondly, to identify whether increasing the number of cores was predictive for the occurrence of complications. Thirdly, to examine the relation between TPB and erectile dysfunction. Methods We analyzed a retrospective multicenter cohort of 550 patients from three different urological centers undergoing TPB without antibiotic prophylaxis. The median number of cores was 26. Demographic and clinical data were extracted by reviewing patients’ electronic medical records and follow-up data such as postoperative complications obtained by structured phone interviews. To investigate the influence of the number of cores taken on the occurrence of complications, we performed univariate and multivariate mixed effects logistic regression models. Results There was no case of sepsis reported. Overall, 6.0% of patients (33/550) presented with any complication besides mild macrohematuria. In all, 46/47 (98%) complications were ≤Grade 2 according to Clavien–Dindo. In multivariate regression analyses, an increased number of cores was associated with overall complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.14, P = 0.01) and specifically bleeding complications (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11–1.50, P = 0.01) but not with infectious complications (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97–1.10, P = 0.67). A total of 14.4% of patients referred impairment of erectile function after TPB. Of note, 98% of these men were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Conclusions This is the first multicenter trial to investigate complications after TPB without antibiotic prophylaxis. In our study, we found no case of sepsis. This underlines the safety advantage of TPB even without antibiotic prophylaxis and supports the ongoing initiative to abandon TRB of the prostate. A higher number of cores were associated with an increase in overall complications specifically bleeding complications, but not with infectious complications. Post-biopsy erectile dysfunction was mainly present in patients diagnosed with PCa.

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Abdulbaki ◽  
A Emam ◽  
M Badawy ◽  
H S Shaker

Abstract Purpose Trans rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy can lead to urinary tract infections in 3% to 11% and sepsis in 0.1% to 5% of patients. We investigated the prevalence of different organisms among rectal flora in our community, the virulence of the most prevalent one and the effect of combined standard antibiotic prophylaxis with the use of povidone iodine suppository prior to TRUS guided biopsy of the prostate in decreasing post biopsy infectious complications. Materials and Methods Between December 2016 and September 2017, 50 men were prospectively randomized to povidone iodine rectal cleansing (50) or no cleansing (50) before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Rectal swab cultures, urinalaysis, urine cultures, total leukocytic count and CRP were obtained before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Patients received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis and attended at 1 week follow up visit. Urinalaysis, urine cultures, total leukocytic count and CRP were obtained at follow up visit and asked about fever, UTI symptoms and examined for prostatitis and epididymo-orchitis. Results Infectious complications were observed in 5 (10%) patients, including 2 (8%) in the treatment group and 3 (12%) in the control group (p = 0.0001). No cases of sepsis were recorded. Mean increase of CRP was higher in control group (P = 0.011). 17 patients among study population had Ciprofloxacin resistant rectal organisms on rectal swab cultures (34%). Conclusion Usage of pre TRUS-Bx intrarectal povidone iodine suppository together with standard antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin helps decrease post procedure infectious complications and proved to decrease incidence of infection among patients having ciprofloxacin resistant rectal organisms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Pilatz ◽  
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos ◽  
Rajan Veeratterapillay ◽  
Yuhong Yuan ◽  
Muhammad Imran Omar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
August Sigle ◽  
Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola ◽  
Marian Pudimat ◽  
Jakob Michaelis ◽  
Cordula A. Jilg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-155
Author(s):  
S.V. Popov ◽  
◽  
I.N. Orlov ◽  
D.Yu. Chernysheva ◽  
T.M. Topuzov ◽  
...  

Introduction. Amount of prostate biopsy procedures rises every year and up to 95% of cases of prostate biopsy is performed via transrectal approach. The incidence of infectious complications of transrectal prostate biopsy reaches up to 17%, while incidence of such complications of transperineal biopsy is about 1%. The majority of international clinical guidelines recommends for obligatory antibiotic prophylaxis prior to prostate biopsy of any approach, but the choice of antibiotic is still debatable. The aim of this review is to sum up the approaches of international urological guidelines to the antibiotic prophylaxis prior to prostate biopsy. Materials and methods. We analyzed the search results in the scientific databases PubMed, Google Scolar, elibrary.ru for the queries «prostate biopsy», «antibacterial prophylaxis» and «guidelines». Results. According to the recommendations of most professional communities, antibacterial prophylaxis of infectious complications of prostate biopsy can be carried out in various ways - once or for a long time, one- or two-component, empirically or on the basis of urine culture on microflora. Conclusion. Despite the differences in the levels of sensitivity and resistance of coliform flora around the world, the clinical guidelines in most countries are uniform in terms of the choice of drugs to reduce the risk of developing infectious complications after prostate biopsy. Approaches to antibacterial prophylaxis after prostate biopsy differ only depending on the type of biopsy access.


2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Davis ◽  
Mariela Martinez Rivera ◽  
Michael Silver ◽  
David Daniel ◽  
David Silver ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document