scholarly journals RANKL signaling in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells negatively regulates osteoblastic bone formation

Bone Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Xin Zhi ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Jiacan Su
2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 500-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Lu ◽  
Man-Li Tu ◽  
Chang-Jun Li ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Tie-Jian Jiang ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. e0178158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Aquino-Martínez ◽  
Natalia Artigas ◽  
Beatriz Gámez ◽  
José Luis Rosa ◽  
Francesc Ventura

Coatings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 840
Author(s):  
Francesca Salamanna ◽  
Nicolandrea Del Piccolo ◽  
Maria Sartori ◽  
Gianluca Giavaresi ◽  
Lucia Martini ◽  
...  

Bone regeneration remains one of the major clinical needs in orthopedics, and advanced and alternative strategies involving bone substitutes, cells, and growth factors (GFs) are mandatory. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the association of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC), isolated by ‘one-step surgical procedure’, and activated platelet rich plasma (PRP) improves osseointegration and bone formation of a hydroxyapatite-coated titanium (Ti-HA) implant, already in clinical use, in a rabbit cancellous defect. The GFs present in plasma, in inactivated and activated PRP were also tested. At 2 weeks, histology and histomorphometry highlighted increased bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in Ti-HA combined with BMSC and PRP in comparison to Ti-HA alone and Ti-HA + PRP. The combined effect of BMSC and PRP peaked at 4 weeks where the BIC value was higher than all other treatments. At both experimental times, newly formed bone (Trabecular Bone Volume, BV/TV) in all tested treatments showed increased values in comparison to Ti-HA alone. At 4 weeks Ti-HA + PRP + BMSC showed the highest BV/TV and the highest osteoblasts number; additionally, a higher osteoid surface and bone formation rate were found in Ti-HA + BMSC + PRP than in all other treatments. Finally, the analyses of GFs revealed higher values in the activated PRP in comparison to plasma and to non-activated PRP. The study suggests that the combination of autologous activated PRP, as a carrier for BMSCs, is a promising regenerative strategy for bone formation, osseointegration, and mineralization of bone implants.


2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Chia-Ning Chang ◽  
Ching-Lung Tai ◽  
Hui-Ying Chung ◽  
Tsung-Min Lin ◽  
Long-Bin Jeng

Author(s):  
Samih Mohamed-Ahmed ◽  
Mohammed A. Yassin ◽  
Ahmad Rashad ◽  
Heidi Espedal ◽  
Shaza B. Idris ◽  
...  

AbstractAdipose-derived stem cells (ASC) have been used as an alternative to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone tissue engineering. However, the efficacy of ASC in bone regeneration in comparison with BMSC remains debatable, since inconsistent results have been reported. Comparing ASC with BMSC obtained from different individuals might contribute to this inconsistency in results. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human ASC and BMSC seeded onto poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) scaffolds using calvarial bone defects in nude rats. First, donor-matched ASC and BMSC were seeded onto the co-polymer scaffolds to evaluate their in vitro osteogenic differentiation. Seeded scaffolds and scaffolds without cells (control) were then implanted in calvarial defects in nude rats. The expression of osteogenesis-related genes was examined after 4 weeks. Cellular activity was investigated after 4 and 12 weeks. Bone formation was evaluated radiographically and histologically after 4, 12, and 24 weeks. In vitro, ASC and BMSC demonstrated mineralization. However, BMSC showed higher alkaline phosphatase activity than ASC. In vivo, human osteogenesis–related genes Runx2 and collagen type I were expressed in defects with scaffold/cells. Defects with scaffold/BMSC had higher cellular activity than defects with scaffold/ASC. Moreover, bone formation in defects with scaffold/BMSC was greater than in defects with scaffold/ASC, especially at the early time-point. These results suggest that although ASC have the potential to regenerate bone, the rate of bone regeneration with ASC may be slower than with BMSC. Accordingly, BMSC are more suitable for bone regenerative applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document