scholarly journals A proposal for comprehensive newborn hearing screening to improve identification of deaf and hard-of-hearing children

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2614-2630 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Eliot Shearer ◽  
◽  
Jun Shen ◽  
Sami Amr ◽  
Cynthia C. Morton ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2845-2846
Author(s):  
A. Eliot Shearer ◽  
◽  
Jun Shen ◽  
Sami Amr ◽  
Cynthia C. Morton ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenore Holte ◽  
Elizabeth Walker ◽  
Jacob Oleson ◽  
Meredith Spratford ◽  
Mary Pat Moeller ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy McConkey Robbins ◽  
Teresa Caraway

In this article, the authors examine factors contributing to a growing early intervention (EI) crisis for babies who are hard of hearing or deaf (HH/D) whose families have chosen spoken language through listening as their desired outcome. At the core of this crisis is the difficulty of, and sometimes resistance to, incorporating nationally accepted best practices for the treatment of childhood hearing loss (Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, 2007) into the EI policies and systems that were created years before newborn hearing screening, advanced hearing technologies, and specialized therapy strategies existed. Today's infants born HH/D and their families represent a new and changing population requiring transformation in how we conceptualize, develop, and implement EI services. There is evidence that, in many cases, we are missing the mark in the ways in which this population is being served. It is our conviction that an EI model most appropriate for HH/D babies whose families have chosen spoken language through listening has features distinct from EI models proposed for children with other disabilities.


Author(s):  
Harry Knoors ◽  
Marc Marschark

Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children are more at risk than hearing children for developing cognitive deficits despite universal newborn hearing screening, early intervention, early input of sign language, and pediatric cochlear implantation. DHH children and adolescents may exhibit cognitive differences due to differences in perception and language modality. They may also experience an elevated risk of developing cognitive deficits due to periods of linguistic and cognitive deprivation and periods of chronic stress and fatigue. This chapter describes the possible causes for cognitive deficits of DHH children and the consequences for learning, both direct (because of cognitive overload) and indirect (because of behavior problems). Subsequently, the chapter outlines the various ways in which cognitive deficits may be accommodated through preventive measures, structured instruction, and specific interventions. The chapter concludes that, in all areas, there is first and foremost a need for more well-constructed effect studies. At the same time, application and further evaluation of the few available well-designed interventions are highly recommended.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Terrey Oliver Penn ◽  
Susan E. Abbott

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Tharpe ◽  
Ellen Wright Clayton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document