scholarly journals ∆133p53 isoform promotes tumour invasion and metastasis via interleukin-6 activation of JAK-STAT and RhoA-ROCK signalling

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamish Campbell ◽  
Nicholas Fleming ◽  
Imogen Roth ◽  
Sunali Mehta ◽  
Anna Wiles ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik W Thompson ◽  
John T Price

Oncogene ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (38) ◽  
pp. 4981-4989 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Roth ◽  
H Campbell ◽  
C Rubio ◽  
C Vennin ◽  
M Wilson ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1101-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Matsumoto ◽  
Noriyasu Takayama ◽  
Junji Ohnishi ◽  
Eriko Ohnishi ◽  
Yasuaki Shirayoshi ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 455 (7210) ◽  
pp. 256-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Ma ◽  
Julie Teruya-Feldstein ◽  
Robert A. Weinberg

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 1887-1895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Li ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Yongquan Shi ◽  
Guanglong Dong ◽  
Jie Liang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norhasimah Mahiddin ◽  
S. A. Hashim Ali

The modified decomposition method (MDM) and homotopy perturbation method (HPM) are applied to obtain the approximate solution of the nonlinear model of tumour invasion and metastasis. The study highlights the significant features of the employed methods and their ability to handle nonlinear partial differential equations. The methods do not need linearization and weak nonlinearity assumptions. Although the main difference between MDM and Adomian decomposition method (ADM) is a slight variation in the definition of the initial condition, modification eliminates massive computation work. The approximate analytical solution obtained by MDM logically contains the solution obtained by HPM. It shows that HPM does not involve the Adomian polynomials when dealing with nonlinear problems.


1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc M. Mareel ◽  
Marc E. Bracke ◽  
Erwin R. Boghaert

Gut ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 791-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
G I Murray ◽  
M E Duncan ◽  
E Arbuckle ◽  
W T Melvin ◽  
J E Fothergill

Background—The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) are strongly implicated in tumour invasion and metastasis.Aims—To investigate the presence of individual MMPs and TIMPs in gastric cancer.Methods—The presence of MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 was identified in a group of gastric cancers (n=74) by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. These antibodies were effective on formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded sections.Results—A large proportion (94%) of gastric cancers contained MMP-2; MMP-1 and MMP-9 were also detected in 73% and 70% of tumours respectively. MMP-3 was only present in 27% of tumours. MMP-1 and MMP-9 were found predominantly in intestinal type tumours. TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were identified in 41% and 57% of tumours respectively. Immunoreactivity for individual MMPs or TIMPs was not identified in normal stomach.Conclusions—This study shows the presence of matrix metalloproteinases, particularly MMP-2, and TIMPs in stomach cancer. Antibodies which are effective in formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded sections are useful for the identification of MMPs and TIMPs in diagnostic specimens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document