scholarly journals Long term Follow-up of Transvaginal Anatomical Implant of Mesh in Pelvic organ prolapse

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
De-Yi Luo ◽  
Tong-Xin Yang ◽  
Hong Shen
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. e3177
Author(s):  
S. Serni ◽  
S. Morselli ◽  
P. Verrienti ◽  
M. Di Camillo ◽  
L. Gemma ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sissel H. Oversand ◽  
Anne Cathrine Staff ◽  
Anny E. Spydslaug ◽  
Rune Svenningsen ◽  
Ellen Borstad

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 240 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Costantini ◽  
M. Lazzeri ◽  
A. Zucchi ◽  
L. Mearini ◽  
M. Del Zingaro ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Balsak ◽  
Ahmet Eser ◽  
Onur Erol ◽  
Derya Deniz Altıntaş ◽  
Şerif Aksin

Pregnancy and birth after a Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) surgery is a rare condition and less is known about the method for delivery. A 31-year-old women with gravida 3 para 3 underwent abdominal sacrohysteropexy and transobturatuar tape (TOT) procedures for stage III prolapse who delivered via vaginal birth and showed no relapse. Sacrohysteropexy is a good option for women with POP who desire fertility with a long term follow-up period.


2014 ◽  
Vol 115 (05) ◽  
pp. 287-291
Author(s):  
P. Papcun ◽  
M. Krizko Jr. ◽  
B. Spodniakova ◽  
M. Redecha ◽  
M. Gabor ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sapna Puri ◽  
Rohini Jaggi ◽  
Isha Sunil

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is common in women and 7-9% undergo surgical repair. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy is the most durable operation for vault prolapse and Nulliparous prolapse respectively. The objectives of this study were to describe Anatomic and symptomatic outcomes up to 5 years after abdominal sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy.Methods: This study was conducted in ASCOMS hospital for a cohort of patients who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) or sacrohysteropexy (ASH) in 2 years (2013-2015) and follow up done for a period of 5 years from 2015-2019. These patients were evaluated for subjective and objective outcomes following ASC and ASH. women completed questionnaires and were examined in gynaecology clinic. Prospective follow up study using standarised examination with pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and questionnairesResults: In the present study, there was low incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as long term complications were significantly low. The anatomical cure rate and patient satisfaction rate was both 100%.Conclusions: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse and sacrohysteropexy for Nulliparous prolapse is safe and effective method and is considered gold standard for treatment of Apical compartment prolapse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document