scholarly journals Growth dynamics and complexity of national economies in the global trade network

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Teza ◽  
Michele Caraglio ◽  
Attilio L. Stella
2021 ◽  
pp. 310-328
Author(s):  
Fatou Guèye ◽  
Ahmadou Aly Mbaye

Sahelian countries, while sharing many features of other Sub-Saharan African economies, face some unique economic challenges, which merit particular scrutiny, notably: a sizable demographic bulge, being landlocked, a lower income per head, and a higher poverty incidence. The picture is further darkened by critical governance weaknesses, political instability, and radical Islamist threats, which, as discussed in other chapters in this volume, have caused serious security challenges within, and across, national borders. All these factors have contributed to a downsizing of the formal business environment and an expansion of the informal sector. This chapter assesses the relative weights of the formal and informal sectors in Sahelian national economies, its growth dynamics, as well as employment and productivity patterns. It also examines the implications of the rise of the informal sector for institutions and governance, social inclusion, and stability.


Author(s):  
Guy-Maurille Massamba

The geostrategic approach refers to China's method to rise as global power through worldwide trade expansion and the development of its military and naval capabilities. It creates clusters of countries interlinked as China's trade partners, thus being assets to its global ascent. China's importance in global trade is a function of its partners' behavior embracing its trade mechanism. The edges connecting nodes are multidirectional, implying that countries are as much interested in their China-induced interlinkages as they are in their partnership with China. This results in China's centrality, a quality gained from being dominant in trade partnerships in terms of numbers and significance. This chapter examines the approach, process, and historical, geographic, and behavioral components that China uses in its ascent as central node in the international trade network. It explores how underlying dimensions making China's national character conjointly devise its behavior in global trade.


Eos ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (44) ◽  
pp. 408-408
Author(s):  
JoAnna Wendel
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1596-1606
Author(s):  
Zhigao LIU ◽  
Tao WANG ◽  
Wei CHEN ◽  

Author(s):  
Wilson Pérez-Oviedo ◽  
John Cajas-Guijarro ◽  
María Cristina Vallejo

Author(s):  
Kaiyao Wu ◽  
Chi Zhou ◽  
Dechun Yan

With the rise and fall of the trade shares of different countries in the world, does the trade network structure change at the same time? Do the dynamics of countries’ positions differ in the evolution of trade network structure? Based on the latest world input-output database (WIOD), this paper illustrates the accounting models of international trade, and describes the dynamics of the global trade network structure and the countries’ positions. Research shows that China and the emerging countries developed faster than the developed countries during 2000-2014, and play important roles, not only in the trade shares, but also in global trade networks. The innovation of this study is that we present a systemic and explicit portrait of the global pattern of trade linkages between countries based on a set of social network analysis methods, and we find that the dynamic of linkage network is more violative than that of linkage flow.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M Peterson

I contend that a state’s position in the global trade network affects the initiation and outcome of sanction threats. A state is vulnerable, and thus more likely to acquiesce, when its trade has low value to trade partners that are well connected to the global trade network. Conversely, a state has leverage that could motivate the use of sanction threats when its trade has high value to trade partners that are otherwise not well connected. Capturing leverage/vulnerability with an interaction between two network centrality measures, results indicate that vulnerability is associated with acquiescence to sanctions, while leverage is associated with threat initiation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document