scholarly journals Bidirectional relation between depression and sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Two longitudinal follow-up studies using a national sample cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
So Young Kim ◽  
Chanyang Min ◽  
Chang Ho Lee ◽  
Bumjung Park ◽  
Hyo Geun Choi
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
So Young Kim ◽  
Mi Kyung Kim ◽  
Jae-Sung Lim ◽  
Il Gyu Kong ◽  
Hyo Geun Choi

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Chien Chen ◽  
Chi-Hsiang Chung ◽  
Chieh-Hua Lu ◽  
Wu-Chien Chien

Background: The risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss associated with metformin use in patients with diabetes mellitus has not been fully examined. Study design: It is a retrospective matched-cohort study. Subjects and methods: We examined the medical records of patients with diabetes mellitus over 18 years old in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database for the period between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2013, to establish matched cohorts (14,109 with and 42,327 without metformin use) at a ratio of 1:3 by sex, age and index year. Results: We used a Cox regression hazard model to identify risk factors of sudden sensorineural hearing loss during 14 years of follow-up, and the results indicate that a significantly lower percentage of diabetes mellitus patients with metformin use ( p = 0.033) developed sudden sensorineural hearing loss compared with those without metformin use (0.21%, 29/14,109 vs 0.32%, 136/42,327). After adjustment for age and other variables [adjusted hazard ratio: 0.630 (95% confidence interval: 0.422–0.941, p = 0.024)], this study also demonstrated that metformin use appeared to reduce the risk of developing sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Conclusion: This study demonstrated an association between metformin use and lower incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss among patients with diabetes mellitus.


1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-315
Author(s):  
Eiji Chida ◽  
Nobukiyo Satoh ◽  
Mitsugu Kawanami ◽  
Masaaki Kashiwamura ◽  
Satoshi Fukuda ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 128 (8) ◽  
pp. 669-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Dallan ◽  
S Fortunato ◽  
A P Casani ◽  
E Bernardini ◽  
S Sellari-Franceschini ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:To evaluate the long-term stability of intratympanic steroids and investigate the ‘real’ impact of sudden sensorineural hearing loss on patients.Method:A total of 14 patients treated with intratympanic steroids were evaluated by audiometric and vestibular examinations. The modified Glasgow Benefit Inventory was used to evaluate quality of life changes after intratympanic steroid treatment.Results:There was no significant difference between pure tone average post-intratympanic steroids and at follow up. The general Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was not significantly associated with the presence of tinnitus or dizziness, or with patient age. The change in pure tone average after intratympanic steroid treatment did not correlate with social or physical scores, but correlated strongly with the general Glasgow Benefit Inventory score (p = 0.0023). Intratympanic steroid administration led to a stable improvement in hearing. Quality of life assessment showed that patients can feel satisfaction regardless of the hearing outcome. Patients who regained a social hearing level expressed greater satisfaction than patients without serviceable hearing. Overall, quality of life improvement was not related to hearing improvement.Conclusion:Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is devastating. Considering the audiological effects alone ignores the ‘human’ perspective. Audiological success can correlate with poor quality of life outcome.


Author(s):  
Kyungil Jang ◽  
So Yun Lim ◽  
Eun-Ju Jeon ◽  
Hyun Jin Lee

Background and Objectives Steroid treatment is used as a main treatment modality for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Intratympanic injection of steroid (ITS) has been used and its therapeutic efficacy reported as being comparable to the systemic steroid administration (SS). This study compares the hearing outcomes of using ITS and SS simultaneously and SS alone.Subjects and Method Retrospective chart review was performed for 146 patients with SSNHL. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the method of treatment (SS and ITS simultaneously vs. SS alone). The inclusion criteria were starting treatment within 7 days after onset, and follow up pure tone audiometry at least 4 weeks after treatment. Hearing gain for pure tone threshold of each frequency and average of 4 frequencies (500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz) were compared between both groups.Results The improvement in PTA at 1-month follow-up was 27.3±20.0 dB HL in the simultaneous group and 19.1±19.5 dB HL in the SS alone group; this was not statistically significant. Complete or partial recovery at 1-month follow-up was observed in 65.3% of the simultaneous group and 69.6% of the SS alone group; this was also not significant.Conclusion There was no significant difference in hearing outcomes between the simultaneous and SS alone group. The simultaneous therapy does not appear to be superior to the SS alone therapy. Further studies using more population and longer follow-up periods are necessary.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chadi Saifan ◽  
Daniel Glass ◽  
Iskandar Barakat ◽  
Suzanne El-Sayegh

Background.Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) caused by opiate abuse or overuse has been well documented in the medical literature. Most documented case reports have involved either heroin or hydrocodone/acetaminophen. Recently, case reposts of methadone induced SSHL have been published.Case Report.We present the case of a 31-year-old man who developed SSHL after a methadone overdose induced stupor. He was subsequently restarted on methadone at his regular dose. On follow-up audiometry exams, he displayed persistent moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally.Discussion.This case is notable because unlike all but one previously reported case, the patient—who was restated on methadone—did not make a complete recovery.Conclusion. Methadone overuse in rare cases causes SSHL.


2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anestis D. Psifidis ◽  
George K. Psillas ◽  
Jiannis Ch. Daniilidis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document