scholarly journals Collinear search impairment is luminance contrast invariant

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-huei Tseng ◽  
Hiu Mei Chow ◽  
Jiayu Liang ◽  
Satoshi Shioiri ◽  
Chien-Chung Chen

AbstractCollinear search impairment (CSI) is a phenomenon where a task-irrelevant collinear structure impairs a target search in a visual display. It has been suggested that CSI is monocular, occurs without the participants’ access to consciousness and is possibly processed at an early visual site (e.g. V1). This effect has frequently been compared with a well-documented opposite effect called attentional capture (AC), in which salient and task-irrelevant basic features (e.g. color, orientation) enhance target detection. However, whether this phenomenon can be attributed to non-attentional factors such as collinear facilitation (CF) has not yet been formally tested. Here we used one well-established property of CF, i.e. that target contrast modulates its effect direction (facilitation vs suppression), to examine whether CSI shared similar signature profiles along different contrast levels. In other words, we tested whether CSI previously observed at the supra-threshold level was reduced or reversed at near-threshold contrast levels. Our results showed that, regardless of the luminance contrast levels, participants spent a longer time searching for targets displayed on the salient singleton collinear structure than those displayed off the structure. Contrast invariance suggests that it is unlikely that CSI is exclusively sub-served by an early vision mechanism (e.g. CF).

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 939-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto J. González-Villar ◽  
Yolanda Triñanes ◽  
Montserrat Zurrón ◽  
María T. Carrillo-de-la-Peña

2005 ◽  
Vol 100 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 943-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kong-King Shieh ◽  
Mei-Hsiang Chen

Reading from a visual display terminal (VDT) has increased enormously with widespread computer use. Whether such reading affects higher cognitive processes requires study so the effect of display medium (LCD screen vs paper) and luminance contrast (1:3, 1:7, 1:11) on concept-formation performance and EEG responses was investigated. 96 men and 24 women participated in two concept-formation tasks (rule learning vs attribute and rule learning). Concept-formation performance and EEG responses were similar for stimuli displayed on paper or LCD screen. The concern that the screen may be detrimental to conception-formation performance was not confirmed; however, luminance contrast significantly affected time to complete a concept-formation task and EEG response. The middle contrast (1:7) had the smallest mean EEG power, so this contrast might be appropriate for cognitive performance. Participants' performance was significantly faster and EEG power lower for the rule-learning task than for an attribute and rule-learning task.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document