Statistics, statistical thinking, and the IACUC

Lab Animal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. e1700768 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Cox ◽  
Bradley Efron

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted V. Cascio

This study assesses the effectiveness of critical thinking drills (CTDs), a repetitious classroom activity designed to improve methodological and statistical thinking in relation to psychological claims embedded in popular press articles. In each of four separate CTDs, students critically analyzed a brief article reporting a recent psychological study by answering a set of 10 critical thinking questions in relation to it. Student responses were subsequently self-scored through an instructor-led discussion session. Results showed that the average CTD score increased linearly between the first and final assessment. These results suggest that critical thinking in relation to scientific claims found in secondary source material can be successfully taught and quantitatively assessed.


1988 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Patricia Cline Cohen ◽  
Theodore M. Porter
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-90
Author(s):  
Bedriye ALTAYLAR ◽  
Sibel KAZAK

Abstract: Purpose of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of the use of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach on sixth grade students’ statistical thinking levels. Mooney’s (2002) statistical thinking framework describing four thinking levels across four different statistical thinking processes was used. This study utilized a quasi-experimental pretestposttest design. In the experimental group, the data handling unit was taught using RME approach whereas in the control group lessons were taught traditionally using a mathematics textbook and direct instruction. A statistical thinking test composed of seven open-ended questions was prepared and applied to both groups as pretest and posttest. The change of students’ statistical thinking levels in pretest and posttest were analyzed and compared in both groups as well as between groups. The data analysis showed that the overall growth at Level 4 across statistical thinking processes was higher for the students who were taught using the RME approach than for those taught traditionally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document