scholarly journals Sensorimotor transformation elicits systematic patterns of activity along the dorsoventral extent of the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Corentin Massot ◽  
Uday K. Jagadisan ◽  
Neeraj J. Gandhi
2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1862-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Churan ◽  
Daniel Guitton ◽  
Christopher C. Pack

Our perception of the positions of objects in our surroundings is surprisingly unaffected by movements of the eyes, head, and body. This suggests that the brain has a mechanism for maintaining perceptual stability, based either on the spatial relationships among visible objects or internal copies of its own motor commands. Strong evidence for the latter mechanism comes from the remapping of visual receptive fields that occurs around the time of a saccade. Remapping occurs when a single neuron responds to visual stimuli placed presaccadically in the spatial location that will be occupied by its receptive field after the completion of a saccade. Although evidence for remapping has been found in many brain areas, relatively little is known about how it interacts with sensory context. This interaction is important for understanding perceptual stability more generally, as the brain may rely on extraretinal signals or visual signals to different degrees in different contexts. Here, we have studied the interaction between visual stimulation and remapping by recording from single neurons in the superior colliculus of the macaque monkey, using several different visual stimulus conditions. We find that remapping responses are highly sensitive to low-level visual signals, with the overall luminance of the visual background exerting a particularly powerful influence. Specifically, although remapping was fairly common in complete darkness, such responses were usually decreased or abolished in the presence of modest background illumination. Thus the brain might make use of a strategy that emphasizes visual landmarks over extraretinal signals whenever the former are available.


1980 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Rizzolatti ◽  
H.A. Buchtel ◽  
R. Camarda ◽  
C. Scandolara

Neuron ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Lyon ◽  
Jonathan J. Nassi ◽  
Edward M. Callaway

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
ETIENNE OLIVIER ◽  
JOHN D. PORTER ◽  
PAUL J. MAY

The presence of a commissure connecting the two superior colliculi suggests they do not act independently, but the function of the tectotectal connection has never been firmly identified. To develop a better understanding of this commissural system, the present study determined the distribution and morphology of tectotectal neurons in the cat and macaque monkey, two animals with well-studied, but different orienting strategies. First, we compared the distribution of tectotectal cells retrogradely labeled following WGA-HRP injections into the contralateral superior colliculus. In monkeys, labeled tectotectal cells were found in all layers, but were concentrated in the intermediate gray layer (75%), particularly dorsally, and the adjacent optic layer (12%). Tectotectal cells were distributed throughout nearly the entire rostrocaudal extent of the colliculus. In cats, tectotectal cells were found in all the layers beneath the superficial gray, but the intermediate gray layer contained the greatest concentration (56%). Labeled cells were almost exclusively located in the rostral half of the cat superior colliculus, in contrast to the monkey distribution. In the context of the representation of visuomotor space in the colliculus, the distribution of monkey and cat tectotectal cells suggests a correspondence with oculomotor range. So these neurons may be involved in directing orienting movements performed within the oculomotor range. The somatodendritic morphology of tectotectal cells in these two species was revealed by homogeneous retrograde labeling from injections of biocytin or biotinylated dextran amine into the contralateral colliculus. The cell classes contributing to this pathway are fairly consistent across the two species. A variety of neuronal morphologies were observed, so there is no single tectotectal cell type. Instead, cell types similar to those found in each layer, excepting the largest neurons, were present among tectotectal cells. This suggests that a sample of each layer's output is sent to the contralateral colliculus.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. May ◽  
Martin O. Bohlen ◽  
Eddie Perkins ◽  
Niping Wang ◽  
Susan Warren

Abstract A projection by the superior colliculus to the supraoculomotor area (SOA) located dorsal to the oculomotor complex was first described in 1978. This projection’s targets have yet to be identified, although the initial study suggested that vertical gaze motoneuron dendrites might receive this input. Defining the tectal targets is complicated by the fact the SOA contains a number of different cell populations. In the present study, we used anterograde tracers to characterize collicular axonal arbors and retrograde tracers to label prospective SOA target populations in macaque monkeys. Close associations were not found with either superior or medial rectus motoneurons whose axons supply singly innervated muscle fibers. S-group motoneurons, which supply superior rectus multiply innervated muscle fibers, appeared to receive a very minor input, but C-group motoneurons, which supply medial rectus multiply innervated muscle fibers, received no input. A number of labeled boutons were observed in close association with SOA neurons projecting to the spinal cord, or the reticular formation in the pons and medulla. These descending output neurons are presumed to be peptidergic cells within the centrally projecting Edinger–Westphal population. It is possible the collicular input provides a signaling function for neurons in this population that serve roles in either stress responses, or in eating and drinking behavior. Finally, a number of close associations were observed between tectal terminals and levator palpebrae superioris motoneurons, suggesting the possibility that the superior colliculus provides a modest direct input for raising the eyelids during upward saccades.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document