scholarly journals The acute respiratory management of cervical spinal cord injury in the first 6 weeks after injury: a systematic review

Spinal Cord ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Berney ◽  
P Bragge ◽  
C Granger ◽  
H Opdam ◽  
L Denehy
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miles Wilson ◽  
Marc Nickels ◽  
Brooke Wadsworth ◽  
Peter Kruger ◽  
Adam Semciw

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Whelan ◽  
Mary Halpine ◽  
Sean D. Christie ◽  
Sonja A. McVeigh

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 2457-2464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad M. Tarawneh ◽  
Daniel D’Aquino ◽  
Aaron Hilis ◽  
Amr Eisa ◽  
Nasir A. Quraishi

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takafumi Yonemitsu ◽  
Azuna Kinoshita ◽  
Keiji Nagata ◽  
Mika Morishita ◽  
Tomoyuki Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Early routine intubation in motor-complete cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) above the C5 level is a conventional protocol to prevent unexpected respiratory exacerbation (RE). However, in context of the recent advances in multidisciplinary respiratory management, the absolute indication for intubation in CSCI patients based on initial neurologic assessment is controversial because of the drawbacks of intubation. This study aimed to redetermine the most important predictor of RE following CSCI after admission without routine intubation among patients admitted with motor-complete injury and/or injury above the C5 level to ensure timely intubation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with acute traumatic CSCI admitted to our hospital without an initial routine intubation protocol from January 2013 to December 2017. CSCI patients who developed RE (defined as unexpected emergent intubation for respiratory resuscitation) were compared with those who did not. Baseline characteristics and severity of trauma data were collected. Univariate analyses were performed to compare treatment data and clinical outcomes between the two groups. Further, multivariate logistic regressions were performed with clinically important independent variables: motor-complete injury, neurologic level above C5, atelectasis, and copious airway secretion (CAS). Results: Among the analyzed 58 patients with CSCI, 35 (60.3%) required post-injury intubation and 1 (1.7%) died during hospitalization. Thirteen (22.4%) had RE in 3.5 days (mean) post-injury; 3 (37.5%) of eight motor-complete CSCI patients above C5 developed RE. Eleven of the 27 (40.7%) patients with motor-complete injury and five of the 22 (22.7%) patients with neurologic injury above C5 required emergency intubation at RE. Three of the eight CSCI patients with both risk factors (motor-complete injury above C5) resulted in emergent RE intubation (37.5%). CAS was an independent predictor for RE (odds ratio 7.19, 95% confidence interval 1.48–42.72, P=0.0144) in multivariate analyses. Conclusion: Timely intubation post-CSCI based on close attention to CAS during the acute 3-day phase may prevent RE and reduce unnecessary invasive airway control even without immediate routine intubation in motor-complete injury above C5.


Author(s):  
Giovanni Morone ◽  
Alessandro De Sire ◽  
Alex Martino Cinnera ◽  
Matteo Paci ◽  
Luca Perrero ◽  
...  

The upper extremities limitation represents one of the essential functional impairments in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Electromechanics assisted devices and robots are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation to help functional improvement in patients with neurological diseases. This review aimed to systematically report the evidence-based, state-of-art on clinical applications and robotic-assisted arm training (RAT) in motor and functional recovery in subjects affected by cervical spinal cord injury. The present study has been carried out within the framework of the Italian Consensus Conference on "Rehabilitation assisted by robotic and electromechanical devices for persons with disability of neurological origin" (CICERONE). PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) databases were systematically searched from inception to September 2021. The 10-item PEDro scale assessed the study quality for the RCT and the AMSTAR-2 for the systematic review. Two different authors rated the studies included in this review. If consensus was not achieved after discussion, a third reviewer was interrogated. The 5-item Oxford CEBM scale was used to rate the level of evidence. A total of 11 studies were included. The selected studies were: two systematic reviews, two RCTs, one parallel-group controlled trial, one longitudinal intervention study and five case series. One RCT was scored as a high-quality study, while the systematic review was of low quality. RAT was reported as feasible and safe. Initial positive effects of RAT were found for arm function and quality of movement in addition to conventional therapy. The high clinical heterogeneity of treatment programs and the variety of robot devices could severely affect the generalizability of the study results; therefore, future studies are warranted to standardize the type of intervention and evaluate the role of robotic-assisted training in subjects affected by cervical spinal cord injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document