scholarly journals Müller glia cells as a source for regenerative retinal neuronal cell types

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 328-328
Author(s):  
Manuela Lahne ◽  
Margaret Brecker ◽  
Stuart E. Jones ◽  
David R. Hyde

Adult zebrafish possess the remarkable capacity to regenerate neurons. In the damaged zebrafish retina, Müller glia reprogram and divide to produce neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) that proliferate and differentiate into both lost neuronal cell types and those unaffected by the damage stimulus, which suggests that developmental specification/differentiation programs might be recapitulated during regeneration. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed that developmental competence factors are expressed following photoreceptor damage induced by intense light or in a genetic rod photoreceptor cell ablation model. In both light- and N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-damaged adult zebrafish retinas, NPCs, but not proliferating Müller glia, expressed fluorescent reporters controlled by promoters of ganglion (atoh7), amacrine (ptf1a), bipolar (vsx1), or red cone photoreceptor cell competence factors (thrb) in a temporal expression sequence. In both damage paradigms, atoh7:GFP was expressed first, followed by ptf1a:EGFP and lastly, vsx1:GFP, whereas thrb:Tomato was observed in NPCs at the same time as ptf1a:GFP following light damage but shifted alongside vsx1:GFP in the NMDA-damaged retina. Moreover, HuC/D, indicative of ganglion and amacrine cell differentiation, colocalized with atoh7:GFP prior to ptf1a:GFP expression in the ganglion cell layer, which was followed by Zpr-1 expression (red/green cone photoreceptors) in thrb:Tomato-positive cells in the outer nuclear layer in both damage paradigms, mimicking the developmental differentiation sequence. However, comparing NMDA- to light-damaged retinas, the fraction of PCNA-positive cells expressing atoh7:GFP increased, that of thrb:Tomato and vsx1:GFP decreased, and that of ptf1a:GFP remained similar. To summarize, developmental cell specification programs were recapitulated during retinal regeneration, which adapted to account for the cell type lost.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1797-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana María López-Colomé ◽  
Edith López ◽  
Orquidia G. Mendez-Flores ◽  
Arturo Ortega

2016 ◽  
Vol 236 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Costa de Andrade ◽  
Christian Wertheimer ◽  
Kirsten Eibl ◽  
Armin Wolf ◽  
Anselm Kampik ◽  
...  

Stem Cells ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena G. Giannelli ◽  
Gian Carlo Demontis ◽  
Grazia Pertile ◽  
Paolo Rama ◽  
Vania Broccoli

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (18) ◽  
pp. 2659-2672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes G.S.H. van Rossum ◽  
Wendy M. Aartsen ◽  
Jan Meuleman ◽  
Jan Klooster ◽  
Anna Malysheva ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lay Khoon Too ◽  
Matthew P. Simunovic

Over the past two decades, progress in our understanding of glial function has been revolutionary. Within the retina, a subset of glial cells termed the “Müller glia (MG),” have been demonstrated to play key roles in retinal homeostasis, structure and metabolism. Additionally, MG have also been shown to possess the regenerative capacity that varies across species. In teleost fish, MG respond to injury by reprogramming into stem-like cells capable of regenerating lost tissue. The expression of stem/progenitor cell markers has been demonstrated broadly in mammalian MG, including human MG, but their in vivo regenerative capacity appears evolutionarily limited. Advances in stem cell therapy have progressively elucidated critical mechanisms underlying innate MG reprogramming in teleost fish, which have shown promising results when applied to rodents. Furthermore, when cultured ex vivo, MG from mammals can differentiate into several retina cell types. In this review, we will explore the reparative and regenerative potential of MG in cellular therapy approaches, and outline our current understanding of embryonic retinal development, the stem-cell potential of MG in adult vertebrate retina (including human), and microenvironmental cues that guide MG reprogramming.


1985 ◽  
Vol 82 (16) ◽  
pp. 5570-5573 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Moscona ◽  
L. Fox ◽  
J. Smith ◽  
L. Degenstein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document