scholarly journals Image Quality Ranking Method for Microscopy

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Koho ◽  
Elnaz Fazeli ◽  
John E. Eriksson ◽  
Pekka E. Hänninen

Abstract Automated analysis of microscope images is necessitated by the increased need for high-resolution follow up of events in time. Manually finding the right images to be analyzed, or eliminated from data analysis are common day-to-day problems in microscopy research today, and the constantly growing size of image datasets does not help the matter. We propose a simple method and a software tool for sorting images within a dataset, according to their relative quality. We demonstrate the applicability of our method in finding good quality images in a STED microscope sample preparation optimization image dataset. The results are validated by comparisons to subjective opinion scores, as well as five state-of-the-art blind image quality assessment methods. We also show how our method can be applied to eliminate useless out-of-focus images in a High-Content-Screening experiment. We further evaluate the ability of our image quality ranking method to detect out-of-focus images, by extensive simulations, and by comparing its performance against previously published, well-established microscopy autofocus metrics.

IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Wenxin Yu ◽  
Xuewen Zhang ◽  
Yunye Zhang ◽  
Zhiqiang Zhang ◽  
Jinjia Zhou

Author(s):  
Weiping Ji ◽  
Jinjian Wu ◽  
Guangming Shi ◽  
Wenfei Wan ◽  
Xuemei Xie

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1149-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingbing Sang ◽  
Xiaojun Wu ◽  
Chaofeng Li ◽  
Alan C. Bovik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document