Acknowledgement of and Adjustment to Hearing Loss: Applications of the Transtheoretical Stages-of-Change Model

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Sharon A. Lesner ◽  
Patricia B. Kricos
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 548-560
Author(s):  
Vinaya Manchaiah ◽  
Barbara Michiels Hernandez ◽  
Douglas L. Beck

AbstractHealth Behavior Change (HBC) refers to facilitating changes to habits and/or behaviors related to health. There are a number of models/theories of HBC, which provide a structured framework to better understand the HBCs of individuals. The Transtheoretical Model (TTM, aka “the Stages of Change” model) is an integrative model used to conceptualize the process of intentional behavior change and is applied to a variety of behaviors, populations, and settings. In the last few years, use of TTM by the profession of audiology has been increasing.This descriptive literature review was aimed at identifying and presenting a summary of research studies, which use TTM to study the attitudes and behaviors of adults with hearing loss.A literature review was conducted.This review included 13 empirical studies.A literature review was conducted using the EBSCOhost and included the databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO.The review suggests TTM is useful in studying the attitudes and behaviors of adults with hearing loss. There are positive associations between stages of change and help-seeking, intervention uptake, and hearing rehabilitation outcome (i.e., benefit and satisfaction). However, associations with intervention decisions and intervention use were not evident. It appears help-seeking, intervention uptake, and successful outcomes are usually displayed in people in the later stages of change as those with greater hearing loss are often in the later stages of change.Understanding the readiness toward help-seeking and uptake of intervention in people with hearing loss based on TTM may help clinicians develop more focused management strategies. However, additional longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to further test the predictive validity of the stages of change model.


2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Y Frasier ◽  
Lisa Slatt ◽  
Vicki Kowlowitz ◽  
Patricia T Glowa

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
JON KEAR-COLWELL ◽  
PHILIP POLLOCK

Applying Prochaska and DiClimente's stages of change model to understanding the sequence of events necessary for an individual to alter patterns of behavior, this article examines the relative merits and problems of two intervention approaches—confrontational techniques and motivational interventions—to working with child sex offenders. It is proposed that confrontational techniques may be antitherapeutic and push offenders further from contemplating and taking responsibility for potential changes in their own behavior. It is suggested further that motivational interventions produce dissonance and then direct the change process in a more productive direction, with a greater probability of offenders taking responsibility for, and engaging in, active treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document