Prophylactic treatment with fresh-frozen plasma in chronic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

2002 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 480-483
Author(s):  
M. Sivakumaran1 ◽  
J. Roland2
Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4139-4139
Author(s):  
Marie Scully ◽  
Michael Flynn ◽  
Jenny Berryman ◽  
Samuel J. Machin

Abstract Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is an acute, life threatening disorder. The mainstay of treatment is plasma exchange (PEX) as a source of ADAMTS 13. In the UK, 20–25% of all plasma consumed is in patients with TTP. In our protocol (up until 31st December 2005) apheresis was initially with cryosupernatant (National Blood Service, UK) unless patients had a previous severe allergic reaction or refractory disease. Apheresis therefore continued with Solvent-Detergent Fresh Frozen Plasma (S/D FFP) Octaplas, (Octapharma, Vienna Austria) virally inactivated plasma, available throughout Europe. We reviewed 50 acute TTP episodes involving 32 patients. Thirteen episodes used cryosupernatant only and in 15 episodes, treatment started with cryosupernatant and changed to Octaplas. The reasons for changing were refractory disease in 2 episodes and major or recurrent allergic reactions to cryosupernatant in 13 cases. Once Octaplas had been used, it was continued on further admissions. In 22 episodes, Octaplas was used exclusively; in 4 cases as physicians choice and in the remaining due to previous reactions to cryosupernatant. The total volume of cryosupernatant used was 508250mls, 27.6% of all plasma; total volume of Octaplas was 1327600mls, 72.4% of all plasma. Citrate mediated reactions associated with symptomatic hypocalcaemia during apheresis were present in 11% of Octaplas and 20% of cryosupernatant. Acute or delayed urticarial or allergic reactions were noted in 5% of Octaplas and 10% cryosupernatant procedures. A particular complication of apheresis is central line infection. There were 21 line infections and in 43% of cases the infection was associated with a reduction in platelet count < 150 × 109/L. In all 50 episodes, the only documented thrombosis was a superficial non central vein in a patient who had received Octaplas. Prevention of venous thrombosis is by use of thromboembolic stockings, low dose aspirin and low molecular weight heparin in patients when platelet counts >50 × 109/L. In episodes receiving only cryosupernatant or Octaplas, there was no significant difference in the median number of PEX to remission, 7(3–14) and 8.5 (5–30) respectively. Baseline viral screen in all episodes was negative after discharge following an acute TTP episode. In conclusion: cryosupernatant and S/D FFP (Octaplas) appear equally efficacious. However, the risk of allergic/urticarial reactions was twice as common with cryosupernatant, as were citrate reactions. Milder allergic reactions to cryosupernatant are possibly higher, but may have been treated with antihistamines and data not recorded. There was no documented viral transmission with either product.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Qiuyan Lin ◽  
Liping Fan ◽  
Haobo Huang ◽  
Feng Zeng ◽  
Danhui Fu ◽  
...  

Purpose. To evaluate the impact of a combination of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and cryosupernatant plasma (CP) as a replacement fluid in therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on early therapeutic response and long-term survival of patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Materials and Methods. A total of 44 patients with suspected TTP were screened by Bentley and PLASMIC scores. Twenty-seven patients treated with TPE using the FFP and CP combination as the replacement fluid were enrolled and divided into two groups: 11 patients who received TPE with CP-dominant replacement fluid (FFP/CP<1) and 16 patients who received TPE with FFP-dominant replacement fluid (FFP/CP>1). Results. There were no significant differences in the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups except for the international normalized ratio (INR). The number of TPE procedures was lower, and time to achieve complete response was shorter in the CP-dominant group than in the FFP-dominant group. There were no significant differences in overall survival between the two groups. Conclusion. The CP-dominant replacement fluid was superior to the FFP-dominant replacement fluid in early response to TPE in patients with TTP, but did not impact the patients’ overall survival.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Catherine A Klapheke ◽  
Chelsea Milito ◽  
Hannah L McRae ◽  
Neil Blumberg ◽  
Majed A Refaai

Background : Plasma exchange is the primary treatment for acute episodes of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP), a rare condition characterized by the formation of thromboses in small blood vessels, resulting in thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia and multi-organ failure. Plasma exchange replacement fluids in TTP include Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) and solvent/detergent treated pooled plasma (SDP), such as Octaplas. SDP is a virus-inactivated, pooled human plasma product with standardized plasma protein content, including ADAMTS13, that has been used in the treatment of TTP. This study evaluates the effectiveness of SDP as compared to FFP in the treatment of acute TTP episodes. Study Design and Methods : A retrospective analysis was conducted comparing SDP- to FFP-treated patients with suspected acute TTP episodes as a primary admitting diagnosis between December 2014 and December 2019. A total of 16 patients were included in this study. The FFP group consisted of 9 patients (6M/3F, median age 44 years), three of whom had relapsed TTP. The SDP cohort had 7 patients (2M/5F, median age 38 years), one of whom had relapsed TTP. The primary outcomes measured included reported thromboembolic and major bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included number of plasma exchange procedures, adverse effects including neurological changes, transfusion of other blood products, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and changes in laboratory values. Results : There were no adverse transfusion reactions reported in either group. 12 bleeding events were reported from 6 patients in the FFP group and 8 bleeding events from 4 patients in the SDP group (p=0.397). No significant differences were detected in ICU stay, hospital LOS, number of plasma units transfused, daily percentage of change of laboratory values, or changes in neurological status. Conclusions:These data confirm the previously reported efficacy of SDP for treating suspected/confirmed TTP.There were no significant differences in thromboembolic or bleeding events between patients who received FFP as compared to SDP. The non-significant differences observed in laboratory values throughout the duration of plasma exchange procedures as well as adverse reactions and clinical outcomes between both groups confirm the safety of SDP when used interchangeably with FFP for the treatment of TTP. Table Disclosures Blumberg: CSL Behring: Consultancy. Refaai:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Octapharma: Research Funding; Instrumentation Laboratory: Research Funding; iLine Microsystems: Research Funding; Diagnostica Stago: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document