Abstract
Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) are known to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity in rat pituitary cells but no direct effects have been reported on sheep pituitary cells. In this study we determined whether either peptide could stimulate intracellular cAMP accumulation in dispersed sheep pituitary cells in primary culture. Time course studies with PACAP showed that tachyphylaxis developed rapidly and so a short incubation time (5 min) was used to define the dose–response relationship. PACAP dose-dependently stimulated intracellular cAMP levels with a half-maximum response at 2·9 ± 0·2 nmol/l (n=4). In contrast, VIP only caused a small increase in intracellular cAMP levels at the highest dose tested (1 μmol/l). The VIP antagonist [4C1-d-Phe6,Leu17]VIP had no effect on the cAMP response to either PACAP or VIP while the peptide PACAP(6–38), a putative PACAP antagonist, blocked the cAMP response to PACAP. The desensitisation to PACAP was further investigated by pretreating cells with PACAP for 30 min. After a further 15 min in culture medium alone, these cells showed no cAMP response to subsequent treatment with PACAP but could respond to forskolin. When a longer incubation period of 240 min was used between the first and second treatment with PACAP, a partial return in responsiveness to PACAP was observed. In summary, these results show that PACAP activates adenylate cyclase in sheep pituitary cells but that there is rapid development of tachyphylaxis. Experiments with the antagonists suggest that the response to PACAP is via the PACAP type I receptor. In contrast, physiological doses of VIP do not stimulate cAMP accumulation in sheep pituitary cells.
Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 148, 545–552
Effect of Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide and Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide on Mouse Preantral Follicle Development in Vitro
