The effect of ultrasound on the attractiveness of acoustic mating signals

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 322-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. E. Farris ◽  
T. G. Forrest ◽  
R. R. Hoy
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Bicheng Zhu ◽  
Ya Zhou ◽  
Yue Yang ◽  
Ke Deng ◽  
Tongliang Wang ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1461-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Greenfield ◽  
Rafael L. Rodriguez

2019 ◽  
Vol 286 (1912) ◽  
pp. 20191067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry D. Legett ◽  
Rachel A. Page ◽  
Ximena E. Bernal

Conspicuous mating signals attract mates but also expose signallers to predators and parasites. Signal evolution, therefore, is driven by conflicting selective pressures from multiple receivers, both target and non-target. Synchronization of mating signals, for example, is an evolutionary puzzle, given the assumed high cost of reduced female attraction when signals overlap. Synchronization may be beneficial, however, if overlapping signals reduce attraction of non-target receivers. We investigate how signal synchronization is shaped by the trade-off between natural and sexual selection in two anuran species: pug-nosed tree frogs ( Smilisca sila ), in which males produce mating calls in near-perfect synchrony, and túngara frogs ( Engystomops pustulosus ), in which males alternate their calls. To examine the trade-off imposed by signal synchronization, we conducted field and laboratory playback experiments on eavesdropping enemies (bats and midges) and target receivers (female frogs). Our results suggest that, while synchronization can be a general strategy for signallers to reduce their exposure to eavesdroppers, relaxed selection by females for unsynchronized calls is key to the evolution and maintenance of signal synchrony. This study highlights the role of relaxed selection in our understanding of the origin of mating signals and displays.


Cell ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly Errede ◽  
Thomas S. Cardillo ◽  
Fred Sherman ◽  
Evelyn Dubois ◽  
Jacqueline Deschamps ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Reinhardt

Comparing the reproductive output of intra- and inter-population matings is the most common way to assess whether post-mating reproductive isolation is caused by genetic incompatibilities. Such genetic incompatibility can however, only assume that the quantity of the post-mating signals involved does not differ between intra- and inter-population matings. This assumption may not be true because sexual selection predicts reduced mating effort towards low-quality mates and in many circumstances, allopatric partners are low-quality mates. Post-mating efforts may, therefore, be reduced in inter- compared to intra-population matings. Here, I test this crucial assumption by studying variation in one post-mating trait, sperm number, in crosses of two parapatric grasshopper populations. In both populations, males transferred fewer sperm to allopatric than sympatric females. If such plasticity with respect to population is common in other post-mating traits, differences between inter- and intra-population crosses may be more frequently caused by differences in sperm number rather than gamete incompatibility. Additionally, I found that sperm numbers declined less rapidly in the female storage organ of allopatric than sympatric females but its rate differed markedly between populations. This is discussed with respect to female adaptations to male traits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document