Two isoforms of the GBSSI class of granule-bound starch synthase are differentially expressed in the pea plant (Pisum sativum L.)

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1566-1572 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. DENYER ◽  
L. M. BARBER ◽  
E. A. EDWARDS ◽  
A. M. SMITH ◽  
T. L. WANG
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo LI ◽  
Shuangchao Wang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Dewen Qiu

Abstract Backgroud Huanglongbing (HLB) is currently one of the most destructive citrus disease worldwide. It is caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), a nonculturable alpha-proteobacterium, which it resides exclusively in the phloem tissues. Therefore, understanding the early CLas-responsive proteins in citrus petiole where pathogenic bacteria colonized will help to investigate plant resistance to the pathogen.Results In this study, a comparative proteomic approach was applied to identify the petiole proteins associated with the response to CLas infection. A total of 777 proteins were differentially expressed in response to CLas. Among them, 499 proteins were up-regulated and 278 were down-regulated. Among the most highly up-regulated differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were salicylate carboxymethyltransferase, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 13, trans-resveratrol di-O-methyltransferase, linoleate 13S-lipoxygenase 2-1, granule-bound starch synthase 1 and thaumatin-like proteins. While the most highly down-regulated DEPs were oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase, peroxidases and photosystem reaction center subunits. The results of qPCR analysis of a number of indicated DEPs and western blotting further validated four representative DEPs, including salicylate carboxymethyltransferase, linoleate 13S-lipoxygenase 2-1, granule-bound starch synthase 1 and photosystem I reaction center subunit showed that most of detected DEPs were positively correlated with their mRNA and protein levels.Conclusions Our comparative proteomic analysis first profiling reveals early and primary proteome alterations in CLas-infected citrus petiole, where pathogens reside in. The DEPs results demonstrate that CLas infection could promote the carbohydrate metabolism, depress the photosystem and activate/inhibit defense responses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 6135
Author(s):  
Pu Yang ◽  
Zhonghao Li ◽  
Caoyang Wu ◽  
Yan Luo ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  

Pea (Pisum sativum L.), as a major source of plant protein, is becoming one of the major cultivated crop species worldwide. In pea, the pericarp is an important determinant of the morphological characteristics and seed yield. To investigate the molecular mechanism of pericarp elongation as well as sucrose and starch accumulation in the pods of different pea cultivars, we performed transcriptomic analysis of the pericarp of two types of pea cultivar (vegetable pea and grain pea) using RNA-seq. A total of 239.44 Gb of clean sequence data were generated, and were aligned to the reference genome of Pisum sativum L. In the two samples, 1935 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Among these DEGs, three antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) were detected to have higher expression levels in the grain pea pericarps at the pod-elongating stages. Otherwise, five peroxidase (POD)-encoding genes were detected to have lower expression levels in the vegetative pericarps at the development stage of pea pod growth. Furthermore, genes related to starch and sucrose metabolism in the pea pod, such as SUS, INV, FBA, TPI, ADPase, SBE, SSS, and GBSS, were found to be differentially expressed. The RNA-seq data were validated through real-time quantitative RT-PCR of 13 randomly selected genes. Our findings provide the gene expression profile of, as well as differential expression information on, the two pea cultivars, which will lay the foundation for further studies on pod development and nutrition accumulation in the pea and provide valuable information for pea cultivar improvement.


Planta ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 204 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Tomlinson ◽  
Josephine Craig ◽  
Alison M. Smith

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prachi Garg ◽  
◽  
A. Hemantaranjan ◽  
Jyostnarani Pradhan ◽  
◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-360
Author(s):  
М.А. ВИШНЯКОВА ◽  
◽  
Е.В. СЕМЕНОВА ◽  
И.А. КОСАРЕВА ◽  
Н.Д. КРАВЧУК ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document